These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12036004)

  • 1. Discrepancies between explicit and implicit review: physician and nurse assessments of complications and quality.
    Weingart SN; Davis RB; Palmer RH; Cahalane M; Hamel MB; Mukamal K; Phillips RS; Davies DT; Iezzoni LI
    Health Serv Res; 2002 Apr; 37(2):483-98. PubMed ID: 12036004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of administrative data to find substandard care: validation of the complications screening program.
    Weingart SN; Iezzoni LI; Davis RB; Palmer RH; Cahalane M; Hamel MB; Mukamal K; Phillips RS; Davies DT; Banks NJ
    Med Care; 2000 Aug; 38(8):796-806. PubMed ID: 10929992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Physician-reviewers' perceptions and judgments about quality of care.
    Weingart SN; Mukamal K; Davis RB; Davies DT; Palmer RH; Cahalane M; Hamel MB; Phillips RS; Iezzoni LI
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2001 Oct; 13(5):357-65. PubMed ID: 11669563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does the Complications Screening Program flag cases with process of care problems? Using explicit criteria to judge processes.
    Iezzoni LI; Davis RB; Palmer RH; Cahalane M; Hamel MB; Mukamal K; Phillips RS; Banks NJ; Davis DT
    Int J Qual Health Care; 1999 Apr; 11(2):107-18. PubMed ID: 10442841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does clinical evidence support ICD-9-CM diagnosis coding of complications?
    McCarthy EP; Iezzoni LI; Davis RB; Palmer RH; Cahalane M; Hamel MB; Mukamal K; Phillips RS; Davies DT
    Med Care; 2000 Aug; 38(8):868-76. PubMed ID: 10929998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Watching the doctor-watchers. How well do peer review organization methods detect hospital care quality problems?
    Rubin HR; Rogers WH; Kahn KL; Rubenstein LV; Brook RH
    JAMA; 1992 May; 267(17):2349-54. PubMed ID: 1564775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Identification of in-hospital complications from claims data. Is it valid?
    Lawthers AG; McCarthy EP; Davis RB; Peterson LE; Palmer RH; Iezzoni LI
    Med Care; 2000 Aug; 38(8):785-95. PubMed ID: 10929991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. PROs and the health care quality improvement initiative: insights from 50 cases of serious medical mistakes.
    Feldman SE; Rundall TG
    Med Care Rev; 1993; 50(2):123-52. PubMed ID: 10127081
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating the care of general medicine inpatients: how good is implicit review?
    Hayward RA; McMahon LF; Bernard AM
    Ann Intern Med; 1993 Apr; 118(7):550-6. PubMed ID: 8442625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using administrative data to screen hospitals for high complication rates.
    Iezzoni LI; Daley J; Heeren T; Foley SM; Hughes JS; Fisher ES; Duncan CC; Coffman GA
    Inquiry; 1994; 31(1):40-55. PubMed ID: 8168908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality of care problems among Medicare and Medicaid patients.
    Nenner RP; Imperato PJ; Silver AL; Will TO
    J Community Health; 1994 Oct; 19(5):307-18. PubMed ID: 7836553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A computerized system for reviewing medical records from physicians' offices.
    Garnick DW; Lawthers AG; Palmer RH; Moentmann SJ; Fowles J; Weiner JP
    Jt Comm J Qual Improv; 1994 Dec; 20(12):679-94. PubMed ID: 7881518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of iatrogenic injury studies in Australia and the USA. I: Context, methods, casemix, population, patient and hospital characteristics.
    Thomas EJ; Studdert DM; Runciman WB; Webb RK; Sexton EJ; Wilson RM; Gibberd RW; Harrison BT; Brennan TA
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2000 Oct; 12(5):371-8. PubMed ID: 11079216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing patient-reported hospital adverse events with medical record review: do patients know something that hospitals do not?
    Weissman JS; Schneider EC; Weingart SN; Epstein AM; David-Kasdan J; Feibelmann S; Annas CL; Ridley N; Kirle L; Gatsonis C
    Ann Intern Med; 2008 Jul; 149(2):100-8. PubMed ID: 18626049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Peer review of the quality of care. Reliability and sources of variability for outcome and process assessments.
    Smith MA; Atherly AJ; Kane RL; Pacala JT
    JAMA; 1997 Nov; 278(19):1573-8. PubMed ID: 9370502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Screening inpatient quality using post-discharge events.
    Iezzoni LI; Mackiernan YD; Cahalane MJ; Phillips RS; Davis RB; Miller K
    Med Care; 1999 Apr; 37(4):384-98. PubMed ID: 10213019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Structured implicit review: a new method for monitoring nursing care quality.
    Pearson ML; Lee JL; Chang BL; Elliott M; Kahn KL; Rubenstein LV
    Med Care; 2000 Nov; 38(11):1074-91. PubMed ID: 11078049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Identifying adverse events caused by medical care: degree of physician agreement in a retrospective chart review.
    Localio AR; Weaver SL; Landis JR; Lawthers AG; Brenhan TA; Hebert L; Sharp TJ
    Ann Intern Med; 1996 Sep; 125(6):457-64. PubMed ID: 8779457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Process and outcome of care for acute myocardial infarction among Medicare beneficiaries in Connecticut: a quality improvement demonstration project.
    Meehan TP; Hennen J; Radford MJ; Petrillo MK; Elstein P; Ballard DJ
    Ann Intern Med; 1995 Jun; 122(12):928-36. PubMed ID: 7755229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Peer review organizations. Promises and potential pitfalls.
    Dans PE; Weiner JP; Otter SE
    N Engl J Med; 1985 Oct; 313(18):1131-7. PubMed ID: 3930964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.