These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12036637)

  • 1. In vivo confocal microscopy through-focusing to measure corneal flap thickness after laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Gokmen F; Jester JV; Petroll WM; McCulley JP; Cavanagh HD
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2002 Jun; 28(6):962-70. PubMed ID: 12036637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of corneal flap thickness between primary and fellow eyes using three microkeratomes.
    Shemesh G; Leibovitch I; Lipshitz I
    J Refract Surg; 2004; 20(5):417-21. PubMed ID: 15523951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality assessment model of 3 different microkeratomes through confocal microscopy.
    Javaloy Estañ J; Vidal MT; Quinto A; De Rojas V; Alió JL
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Jun; 30(6):1300-9. PubMed ID: 15177608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Laser in situ keratomileusis flap thickness using the Hansatome microkeratome with zero compression heads.
    Taneri S
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Jan; 32(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 16516782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predictability of corneal flap thickness in laser in situ keratomileusis using three different microkeratomes.
    Shemesh G; Dotan G; Lipshitz I
    J Refract Surg; 2002; 18(3 Suppl):S347-51. PubMed ID: 12046880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative performance of the Zyoptix XP and Hansatome zero-compression microkeratomes.
    Pepose JS; Feigenbaum SK; Qazi MA; Merchea M
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Aug; 33(8):1386-91. PubMed ID: 17662429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of myopic laser in situ keratomileusis on epithelial and stromal thickness: a confocal microscopy study.
    Erie JC; Patel SV; McLaren JW; Ramirez M; Hodge DO; Maguire LJ; Bourne WM
    Ophthalmology; 2002 Aug; 109(8):1447-52. PubMed ID: 12153794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reproducibility of LASIK flap thickness using the Hansatome microkeratome.
    Giledi O; Mulhern MG; Espinosa M; Kerr A; Daya SM
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 May; 30(5):1031-7. PubMed ID: 15130640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the IntraLase femtosecond laser and mechanical keratomes for laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Kezirian GM; Stonecipher KG
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Apr; 30(4):804-11. PubMed ID: 15093642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the corneal response to laser in situ keratomileusis with flap creation using the FS15 and FS30 femtosecond lasers: clinical and confocal microscopy findings.
    Hu MY; McCulley JP; Cavanagh HD; Bowman RW; Verity SM; Mootha VV; Petroll WM
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Apr; 33(4):673-81. PubMed ID: 17397742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. LASIK flap thickness profile and reproducibility of the standard vs zero compression Hansatome microkeratomes: three-dimensional display with Artemis VHF digital ultrasound.
    Reinstein DZ; Archer TJ; Gobbe M
    J Refract Surg; 2011 Jun; 27(6):417-26. PubMed ID: 21410084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A longitudinal study of LASIK flap and stromal thickness with high-speed optical coherence tomography.
    Li Y; Netto MV; Shekhar R; Krueger RR; Huang D
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Jun; 114(6):1124-32. PubMed ID: 17320959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factors predictive of LASIK flap thickness with the Hansatome zero compression microkeratome.
    Choudhri SA; Feigenbaum SK; Pepose JS
    J Refract Surg; 2005; 21(3):253-9. PubMed ID: 15977882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Corneal flap displacement and drift in LASIK: comparison of Hansatome and Automated Corneal Shaper microkeratomes.
    Ufret-Vincenty RL; Jiunn-Liang Chen R; Azar DT
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Nov; 134(5):701-6. PubMed ID: 12429246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Corneal flap thickness and topography changes induced by flap creation during laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Güell JL; Velasco F; Roberts C; Sisquella MT; Mahmoud A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Jan; 31(1):115-9. PubMed ID: 15721703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optical coherence tomography evaluation of the corneal cap and stromal bed features after laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia and astigmatism.
    Maldonado MJ; Ruiz-Oblitas L; Munuera JM; Aliseda D; García-Layana A; Moreno-Montañés J
    Ophthalmology; 2000 Jan; 107(1):81-7; discussion 88. PubMed ID: 10647724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reproducibility of corneal flap thickness in laser in situ keratomileusis using the Hansatome microkeratome.
    Yildirim R; Aras C; Ozdamar A; Bahcecioglu H; Ozkan S
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2000 Dec; 26(12):1729-32. PubMed ID: 11134871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of flap thickness reproducibility using microkeratomes with a second motor for advancement.
    Miranda D; Smith SD; Krueger RR
    Ophthalmology; 2003 Oct; 110(10):1931-4. PubMed ID: 14522767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratomes for flap creation in laser in situ keratomileusis and effect of postoperative measurement interval on estimated femtosecond flap thickness.
    Rosa AM; Neto Murta J; Quadrado MJ; Tavares C; Lobo C; Van Velze R; Castanheira-Dinis A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 May; 35(5):833-8. PubMed ID: 19393881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Randomized prospective clinical study comparing induced aberrations with IntraLase and Hansatome flap creation in fellow eyes: potential impact on wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Tran DB; Sarayba MA; Bor Z; Garufis C; Duh YJ; Soltes CR; Juhasz T; Kurtz RM
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Jan; 31(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 15721701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.