These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12036666)
1. Validity of a new disk grading scale for estimating glaucomatous damage: correlation with visual field damage. Bayer A; Harasymowycz P; Henderer JD; Steinmann WG; Spaeth GL Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Jun; 133(6):758-63. PubMed ID: 12036666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimation of the Disc Damage Likelihood Scale in primary open-angle glaucoma: the Glaucoma Stereo Analysis Study. Kitaoka Y; Tanito M; Yokoyama Y; Nitta K; Katai M; Omodaka K; Nakazawa T Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2016 Mar; 254(3):523-8. PubMed ID: 26666233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Correlation of Disc Damage Likelihood Scale, visual field, and Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II in patients with glaucoma. Hornova J; Kuntz Navarro JB; Prasad A; Freitas DG; Nunes CM Eur J Ophthalmol; 2008; 18(5):739-47. PubMed ID: 18850552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validity of a new disk grading scale for estimating glaucomatous damage: correlation with visual field damage. Hoh ST Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 May; 135(5):749-50; author reply 750. PubMed ID: 12719109 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of optic nerve head topography and visual field in eyes with open-angle and angle-closure glaucoma. Boland MV; Zhang L; Broman AT; Jampel HD; Quigley HA Ophthalmology; 2008 Feb; 115(2):239-245.e2. PubMed ID: 18082888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic capability of optical coherence tomography in evaluating the degree of glaucomatous retinal nerve fiber damage. Sihota R; Sony P; Gupta V; Dada T; Singh R Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 May; 47(5):2006-10. PubMed ID: 16639009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of optic disk by disk damage likelihood scale staging using slit-lamp biomicroscopy and optical coherence tomography in diagnosing primary open-angle glaucoma. Singh K; Bhushan P; Mishra D; Kaur K; Gurnani B; Singh A; Pandey S Indian J Ophthalmol; 2022 Dec; 70(12):4152-4157. PubMed ID: 36453304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Regional correlation of structure and function in glaucoma, using the Disc Damage Likelihood Scale, Heidelberg Retina Tomograph, and visual fields. Danesh-Meyer HV; Ku JY; Papchenko TL; Jayasundera T; Hsiang JC; Gamble GD Ophthalmology; 2006 Apr; 113(4):603-11. PubMed ID: 16483660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detection of glaucomatous visual field changes using the Moorfields regression analysis of the Heidelberg retina tomograph. Miglior S; Guareschi M; Albe' E; Gomarasca S; Vavassori M; Orzalesi N Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 Jul; 136(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 12834666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Association of magnetic resonance imaging of anterior optic pathway with glaucomatous visual field damage and optic disc cupping. Kashiwagi K; Okubo T; Tsukahara S J Glaucoma; 2004 Jun; 13(3):189-95. PubMed ID: 15118461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Relationship between Humphrey 30-2 SITA Standard Test, Matrix 30-2 threshold test, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients. Bozkurt B; Yilmaz PT; Irkec M J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18414106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessing Precision of Hodapp-Parrish-Anderson Criteria for Staging Early Glaucomatous Damage in an Ocular Hypertension Cohort: A Retrospective Study. Chakravarti T Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila); 2017; 6(1):21-27. PubMed ID: 28161915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Relationship between visual field sensitivity and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness as measured by optical coherence tomography. Ajtony C; Balla Z; Somoskeoy S; Kovacs B Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Jan; 48(1):258-63. PubMed ID: 17197541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of disc damage likelihood scale, cup to disc ratio, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in the diagnosis of glaucoma. Danesh-Meyer HV; Gaskin BJ; Jayusundera T; Donaldson M; Gamble GD Br J Ophthalmol; 2006 Apr; 90(4):437-41. PubMed ID: 16547323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Structure and function evaluation (SAFE): II. Comparison of optic disk and visual field characteristics. Johnson CA; Sample PA; Zangwill LM; Vasile CG; Cioffi GA; Liebmann JR; Weinreb RN Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 Feb; 135(2):148-54. PubMed ID: 12566017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Correlation between disc damage likelihood scale and optical coherence tomography in the diagnosis of glaucoma. Abdul Majid AS; Kwag JH; Jung SH; Yim HB; Kim YD; Kang KD Ophthalmologica; 2010; 224(5):274-82. PubMed ID: 20185941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability of the disk damage likelihood scale. Henderer JD; Liu C; Kesen M; Altangerel U; Bayer A; Steinmann WC; Spaeth GL Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 Jan; 135(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 12504696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of focal lamina cribrosa defect on glaucomatous visual field progression. Faridi OS; Park SC; Kabadi R; Su D; De Moraes CG; Liebmann JM; Ritch R Ophthalmology; 2014 Aug; 121(8):1524-30. PubMed ID: 24697910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]