99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12036832)
1. Optimization of scanning parameters for CT colonography.
Power NP; Pryor MD; Martin A; Horrocks J; McLean AM; Reznek RH
Br J Radiol; 2002 May; 75(893):401-8. PubMed ID: 12036832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Evaluation of different 16-row CT colonography protocols using a porcine model].
Luz O; Schäfer J; Dammann F; Vonthein R; Heuschmid M; Claussen CD
Rofo; 2004 Oct; 176(10):1493-500. PubMed ID: 15383984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multi-detector row CT colonography: effect of collimation, pitch, and orientation on polyp detection in a human colectomy specimen.
Taylor SA; Halligan S; Bartram CI; Morgan PR; Talbot IC; Fry N; Saunders BP; Khosraviani K; Atkin W
Radiology; 2003 Oct; 229(1):109-18. PubMed ID: 14519872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Optimization of scanning parameters for multi-slice CT colonography: experiments with synthetic and animal phantoms.
Embleton KV; Nicholson DA; Hufton AP; Jackson A
Clin Radiol; 2003 Dec; 58(12):955-63. PubMed ID: 14654028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Optimization of the technique of virtual colonoscopy using a multislice spiral computerized tomography].
Laghi A; Catalano C; Panebianco V; Iannaccone R; Iori S; Passariello R
Radiol Med; 2000 Dec; 100(6):459-64. PubMed ID: 11307507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Polyp size at CT colonography after electronic subtraction cleansing in an anthropomorphic colon phantom.
Zalis ME; Perumpillichira JJ; Kim JY; Del Frate C; Magee C; Hahn PF
Radiology; 2005 Jul; 236(1):118-24. PubMed ID: 15987967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of spatial resolution and tube current on computer-aided detection of polyps on CT colonographic images: phantom study.
Kim SH; Lee JM; Shin CI; Kim HC; Lee JG; Kim JH; Choi JY; Eun HW; Han JK; Lee JY; Choi BI
Radiology; 2008 Aug; 248(2):492-503. PubMed ID: 18539892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Protocol optimization of multidetector computed tomography colonography using pig colonic phantoms.
Won HJ; Choi BI; Kim SH; Kim YI; Youn BJ; Han JK
Invest Radiol; 2005 Jan; 40(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 15597017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [CT-colonography with the 16-slice CT for the diagnostic evaluation of colorectal neoplasms and inflammatory colon diseases].
Röttgen R; Schröder RJ; Lorenz M; Herbel A; Fischbach F; Herzog H; Lopez-Häninnen E; Gutberlet M; Hoffmann K; Helmig K; Felix R
Rofo; 2003 Oct; 175(10):1384-91. PubMed ID: 14556108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Experimental colonic phantom for the evaluation of the optimal scanning technique for CT colonography using a multidetector spiral CT equipment.
Laghi A; Iannaccone R; Mangiapane F; Piacentini F; Iori S; Passariello R
Eur Radiol; 2003 Mar; 13(3):459-66. PubMed ID: 12594547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Small simulated polyps in pig colon: sensitivity of CT virtual colography.
Dachman AH; Lieberman J; Osnis RB; Chen SY; Hoffmann KR; Chen CT; Newmark GM; McGill J
Radiology; 1997 May; 203(2):427-30. PubMed ID: 9114099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. CT colonography: determination of optimal CT technique using a novel colon phantom.
Johnson KT; Johnson CD; Anderson SM; Bruesewitz MR; Mccollough CH
Abdom Imaging; 2004; 29(2):173-6. PubMed ID: 15290942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. CT colonography: does improved z resolution help computer-aided polyp detection?
Sundaram P; Beaulieu CF; Paik DS; Schraedley-Desmond P; Napel S
Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2663-74. PubMed ID: 14596303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Polyp detection with MDCT: a phantom-based evaluation of the impact of dose and spatial resolution.
Ozgün A; Rollvén E; Blomqvist L; Bremmer S; Odh R; Fransson A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Apr; 184(4):1181-8. PubMed ID: 15788591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. CT colonography: Protocol optimization with multi-detector row CT--study in an anthropomorphic colon phantom.
Wessling J; Fischbach R; Meier N; Allkemper T; Klusmeier J; Ludwig K; Heindel W
Radiology; 2003 Sep; 228(3):753-9. PubMed ID: 12954895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimization of multidetector array CT acquisition parameters for CT colonography.
McCollough CH
Abdom Imaging; 2002; 27(3):253-9. PubMed ID: 12173355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Feasibility of ultra-low-dose multi-detector-row CT-colonography: detection of artificial endoluminal lesions in an in-vitro-model with optimization of image quality using a noise reduction filter algorithm.
Branschofsky M; Vogt C; Aurich V; Beck A; Mödder U; Cohnen M
Eur J Med Res; 2006 Jan; 11(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 16504955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Linear polyp measurement at CT colonography: in vitro and in vivo comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional displays.
Pickhardt PJ; Lee AD; McFarland EG; Taylor AJ
Radiology; 2005 Sep; 236(3):872-8. PubMed ID: 16118167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Colonic polyps: effect of attenuation of tagged fluid and viewing window on conspicuity and measurement--in vitro experiment with porcine colonic specimen.
Slater A; Taylor SA; Burling D; Gartner L; Scarth J; Halligan S
Radiology; 2006 Jul; 240(1):101-9. PubMed ID: 16793973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of different window settings on colon polyp measurements with CT virtual colonoscopy: a phantom study.
Wu XW; Wang WQ; Xu JM; Liu B
Clin Imaging; 2011; 35(4):274-8. PubMed ID: 21724119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
