These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12037409)

  • 1. Construction of a confidence set of markers for the location of a disease gene using affected sib pair data.
    Lin S
    Hum Hered; 2002; 53(2):103-12. PubMed ID: 12037409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of stratification in the analysis of affected-sib-pair data: benefits and costs.
    Leal SM; Ott J
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Feb; 66(2):567-75. PubMed ID: 10677317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Linkage analysis in nuclear families. 1: Optimality criteria for affected sib-pair tests.
    Knapp M; Seuchter SA; Baur MP
    Hum Hered; 1994; 44(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 8163290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nonparametric simulation-based statistics for detecting linkage in general pedigrees.
    Davis S; Schroeder M; Goldin LR; Weeks DE
    Am J Hum Genet; 1996 Apr; 58(4):867-80. PubMed ID: 8644751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Consanguinity and the sib-pair method: an approach using identity by descent between and within individuals.
    Génin E; Clerget-Darpoux F
    Am J Hum Genet; 1996 Nov; 59(5):1149-62. PubMed ID: 8900245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The generalized sib pair IBD distribution: its use in the detection of linkage.
    Suarez BK; Rice J; Reich T
    Ann Hum Genet; 1978 Jul; 42(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 686687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Affected sib pair identity by state analyses.
    Thomson G; Motro U
    Genet Epidemiol; 1994; 11(4):353-64. PubMed ID: 7813897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Affected-sib-pair interval mapping and exclusion for complex genetic traits: sampling considerations.
    Hauser ER; Boehnke M; Guo SW; Risch N
    Genet Epidemiol; 1996; 13(2):117-37. PubMed ID: 8722742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mixture models for linkage analysis of affected sibling pairs and covariates.
    Devlin B; Jones BL; Bacanu SA; Roeder K
    Genet Epidemiol; 2002 Jan; 22(1):52-65. PubMed ID: 11754473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A robust identity-by-descent procedure using affected sib pairs: multipoint mapping for complex diseases.
    Liang KY; Chiu YF; Beaty TH
    Hum Hered; 2001; 51(1-2):64-78. PubMed ID: 11096273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Simultaneous localization of two linked disease susceptibility genes.
    Biernacka JM; Sun L; Bull SB
    Genet Epidemiol; 2005 Jan; 28(1):33-47. PubMed ID: 15481103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Two-stage global search designs for linkage analysis I: use of the mean statistic for affected sib pairs.
    Guo X; Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Feb; 18(2):97-110. PubMed ID: 10642424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. False disease region identification from identity-by-descent haplotype sharing in the presence of phenocopies.
    Macgregor S; Knott SA; Visscher PM
    Twin Res Hum Genet; 2006 Feb; 9(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 16611462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nonparametric trend statistic incorporating dispersion differences in sib pair linkage for quantitative traits.
    Kim MK; Hong YJ; Song HH
    Hum Hered; 2006; 62(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 16954696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Weighting affected sib pairs by marker informativity.
    Franke D; Ziegler A
    Am J Hum Genet; 2005 Aug; 77(2):230-41. PubMed ID: 15986318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficient intermediate fine mapping: confidence set inference with likelihood ratio test statistic.
    Sinha R; Luo Y
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 31(8):922-36. PubMed ID: 17615574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A confidence-set approach for finding tightly linked genomic regions.
    Lin S; Rogers JA; Hsu JC
    Am J Hum Genet; 2001 May; 68(5):1219-28. PubMed ID: 11309687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Suggestive evidence for a schizophrenia susceptibility locus on chromosome 6q and a confirmation in an independent series of pedigrees.
    Cao Q; Martinez M; Zhang J; Sanders AR; Badner JA; Cravchik A; Markey CJ; Beshah E; Guroff JJ; Maxwell ME; Kazuba DM; Whiten R; Goldin LR; Gershon ES; Gejman PV
    Genomics; 1997 Jul; 43(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 9226366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Potential bias in Generalized Estimating Equations linkage methods under incomplete information.
    Lebrec J; Putter H; van Houwelingen JC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Jan; 30(1):94-100. PubMed ID: 16307436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sample size requirements to control for stochastic variation in magnitude and location of allele-sharing linkage statistics in affected sibling pairs.
    Cordell HJ
    Ann Hum Genet; 2001 Sep; 65(Pt 5):491-502. PubMed ID: 11806857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.