These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Group Health to drop coverage for 21,000. Rauber C Mod Healthc; 1999 Jun; 29(25):88. PubMed ID: 10538607 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Value of preventive services questionable for HMO patients over 75, study suggests. Health Care Strateg Manage; 2000 Mar; 18(3):6. PubMed ID: 10787666 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Washington state: a laboratory for healthcare policy. Greenawalt L; Sanders C Healthc Financ Manage; 2002 Jun; 56(6):suppl 70-2, 74. PubMed ID: 12061056 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Multispecialty group struggles to fund programs developed under capitation as patients shift to FFS. Capitation Manag Rep; 2002 Oct; 9(10):154-6, 145. PubMed ID: 12412321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Physician incomes in rural and urban America. Reschovsky JD; Staiti AB Issue Brief Cent Stud Health Syst Change; 2005 Jan; (92):1-4. PubMed ID: 15675029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Group practice. The best way to divide income. Terry K Med Econ; 2004 Apr; 81(7):88-93. PubMed ID: 15124305 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The Maine squeeze on health coverage. Is Maine's health care crisis a harbinger of rural health care's future? Asplund J Trustee; 2002 Sep; 55(8):36-40, 42, 1. PubMed ID: 12239778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Group practice recommendations of the Committee on the Costs of Medical Care: a new look at an old issue. Schroeder SA Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc; 1978; 56(2):169-86. PubMed ID: 248634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Case study. The little HMO that could: heart of America HMO in Rugby, North Dakota. Sternberg L Health Syst Lead; 1995 Nov; 2(9):16-22. PubMed ID: 10152495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Group therapy. New information system allows medical group to integrate crucial operational details, improve collections and decrease bad debt. Morrissey J Mod Healthc; 2002 Oct; 32(43):48-50, 52, 54 passim. PubMed ID: 12436780 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Medicaid participation. How does your group compare? Anderson PS Med Group Manage; 1986; 33(4):14-8. PubMed ID: 10300961 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating the impact. The Medicare fee schedule. Dempsey WS Group Pract J; 1989; 38(4):20, 22, 24. PubMed ID: 10303707 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The best ways to divide overhead. Lowes RL Med Econ; 1997 Nov; 74(23):77-8, 81-4, 87-8. PubMed ID: 10175849 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The changing climate of medical practice. What future for primary care private practice? Berrien R N Engl J Med; 1987 Feb; 316(6):334-7. PubMed ID: 3543676 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A critical role. Roundtable discussion. Bullock S; Schou P; Sexton W; Stuart P Mod Healthc; 2007 Nov; 37(44):24-7. PubMed ID: 18163258 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]