These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12038317)
1. K.S. Scaria v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co. 10 Apr 1975. Wisconsin. Supreme Court Wests North West Rep; 1975; 227():647-60. PubMed ID: 12038317 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The doctrines of lack of consent and lack of informed consent in medical procedures in Louisiana. Boland GL LA Law Rev; 1983 Sep; 45(1):1-38. PubMed ID: 11658587 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Informed consent in New York under the Medical Malpractice Insurance Act. Rosen MW Hofstra Law Rev; 1976; 4(3):701-27. PubMed ID: 11664598 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Medical risks, patients' rights, and the inadequacies of the negligence action. Martin R Hong Kong Law J; 1985 May; 15(2):150-66. PubMed ID: 11658882 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Reibl v. Hughes. Canada. Supreme Court Dom Law Rep; 1980 Oct; 114():1-35. PubMed ID: 12041068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Informed consent in Kentucky after the Medical Malpractice Insurance and Claims Act of 1976. Curtis JV KY Law J; 1976; 65():524-40. PubMed ID: 11664783 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Hills v. Potter. Great Britain. England. Queen's Bench Division All Engl Law Rep; 1983 May; [1983] 3():716-29. PubMed ID: 11648156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Consent to treatment--how informed is informed consent? Brahams D Med Leg J; 1984; 52(2):77-9. PubMed ID: 11658727 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Hopp v. Lepp. Canada. Supreme Court Dom Law Rep; 1980 May; 112():67-83. PubMed ID: 12041085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Tort--informed consent--new directions for medical disclosure--Hopp v. Lepp and Reibl v. Hughes. Gochnauer M; Fleming DJ Univ B C Law Rev; 1981; 15(2):475-97. PubMed ID: 11658641 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Informed consent and malpractice jeopardy: practical aspects. Alsobrook HB Trans Sect Otolaryngol Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol; 1975; 80(3):ORL277-81. PubMed ID: 11664753 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Medical decision-making: patient participation. Wolfgarten A; Khan A Med Leg J; 1984; 52(Pt. 3):180-90. PubMed ID: 11649586 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. California Supreme Court expands the informed consent doctine; physicians have a duty to obtain an informed refusal: Truman v. Thomas. Cluff CA Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1980; 1980(4):933-47. PubMed ID: 11655722 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Informed consent liability. Recher BC Drake Law Rev; 1976; 26(3):696-715. PubMed ID: 11664787 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Kelly v. Hazlett. 29 Jul 1976. Ontario. High Court of Justice Dom Law Rep; 1976; ():. PubMed ID: 12038305 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Medical malpractice: informed consent cases in "full-disclosure" jurisdictions. Seidelson DE Duquesne Law Rev; 1976; 14(3):309-47. PubMed ID: 11664631 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Robinson v. Parrish. U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit Fed Report; 1983 Dec; 720():1548-52. PubMed ID: 11648163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Informed refusal: an unnecessary burden on physicians? Shank S UMKC Law Rev; 1981; 49(3):365-76. PubMed ID: 11658619 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]