These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12038327)
1. Dumer v. St. Michael's Hospital. 30 Sep 1975. Wisconsin. Supreme Court Wests North West Rep; 1975; 233():372-80. PubMed ID: 12038327 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Tort liability for wrongfully causing one to be born. Sarno GG Am Law Rep ALR 3rd Cases Annot; 1978; 83():15-110. PubMed ID: 12091930 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Robak v. United States. U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit Fed Report; 1981 Aug; 658():471-80. PubMed ID: 11648469 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Robak v. United States: a precedent-setting damage formula for wrongful birth. Leightman CW Chic Kent Law Rev; 1982; 58(3):725-64. PubMed ID: 11658600 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Procanik by Procanik v. Cillo. New Jersey. Supreme Court Atl Report; 1984 Aug; 478():755-73. PubMed ID: 11648486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The legal recognition of medical malpractice tort claims based upon theories of wrongful birth and wrongful life. Mayo KL North Carol Centr Law J; 1985; 15(2):274-94. PubMed ID: 11658795 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Excusing by statute the missing elements of torts of eugenic nondisclosure. Halligan PD J Legis; 1982; 9(1):52-102. PubMed ID: 11658469 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Hummel v. Reiss: the New Jersey Supreme Court takes a step backward in its recognition of wrongful life. Barrett TA Rutgers Law Rev; 1993; 46(1):535-63. PubMed ID: 11652806 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Policy factors in actions for wrongful birth. Symmons CR Mod Law Rev; 1987 May; 50(3):269-306. PubMed ID: 11658925 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Washington recognizes wrongful birth and wrongful life: a critical analysis--Harbeson v. Parke-Davis, Inc., 98 Wn.2d 460, 656 P.2d 483 (l983). VanDerhoef PJ Wash Law Rev; 1983 Jul; 58(3):649-78. PubMed ID: 11658507 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The abortion alternative and the patient's right to know. Shapiro SC Wash Univ Law Q; 1978; 1978(1):167-210. PubMed ID: 11664983 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Becker v. Schwartz. 27 Dec 1978. New York. Court of Appeals North East Rep Second Ser; 1978; 386():807-19. PubMed ID: 12038344 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Wrongful life and wrongful birth: the current status of negligent genetic counseling. DeWalt T Cooley Law Rev; 1985; 3(1):175-91. PubMed ID: 11658818 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The trend toward judicial recognition of wrongful life: a dissenting view. Kennedy B UCLA Law Rev; 1983 Dec; 31(2):473-501. PubMed ID: 11658675 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Wrongful birth in the abortion context--critique of existing case law and proposal for future actions. Morris KL Denver Law J; 1976; 53(3):501-20. PubMed ID: 11663712 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Wrongful life: recognizing the defective child's right to a cause of action. Peters JD; Peters BM Duquesne Law Rev; 1980; 18(4):857-76. PubMed ID: 11658428 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Wrongful birth and wrongful life: questions of public policy. Donovan JL Loyola Law Rev; 1982; 28(1):77-99. PubMed ID: 11658438 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Wrongful life, wrongful birth, and wrongful pregnancy: judicial divergence in the birth-related torts. DeVries DL; Rifkin AM Forum; 1985; 20(2):207-21. PubMed ID: 11658575 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Comment: wrongful conception and the right not to be harmed. Feinberg J Harv J Law Public Policy; 1985; 8(1):57-77. PubMed ID: 11655782 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]