These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12038346)
21. The new pro-life legislation: patterns and recommendations. Witherspoon JP St Marys Law J; 1976; 7(4):637-97. PubMed ID: 11664635 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Spousal notification and consent in abortion situations: Scheinberg v. Smith. Wiemers D Houst Law Rev; 1982 Jul; 19(5):1025-39. PubMed ID: 11658560 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The consent question--parental and spousal consent for abortions. Davis CD Tex Hosp; 1976 Sep; 32(9):27-30. PubMed ID: 11664739 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Roe v. Wade: what rights the biological father? Georgius EH Hastings Constit Law Q; 1974; 1(1):251-72. PubMed ID: 11664368 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Due process and equal protection: constitutional implications of abortion notice and reporting requirements. Rickless DM Boston Univ Law Rev; 1976 May; 56(3):522-41. PubMed ID: 11664624 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Doe v. Smith. Indiana. Supreme Court North East Rep Second Ser; 1988 Aug; 527():177-8. PubMed ID: 12041235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Coe v. Gerstein. 17 Apr 1974. U.S. District Court, S.D. Florida Fed Suppl; 1974; 376():695-9. PubMed ID: 11645991 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Reproduction and the law. Erickson NS Med Trial Tech Q; 1985; 32(2):165-74. PubMed ID: 11649200 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Jones v. Smith. U.S. District Court, S.D. Florida Fed Suppl; 1979 Jul; 474():1160-72. PubMed ID: 11648523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Restrictions on the abortion rights of minors: Bellotti v. Baird. Harv Womens Law J; 1980; 3(1):119-39. PubMed ID: 11658352 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The theory of the Danforth case. Canavan F Hum Life Rev; 1976; 2(4):5-14. PubMed ID: 11662291 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Roe to Casey: a survey of abortion law. Pirner RK; Williams LB Washburn Law J; 1993; 32(2):166-89. PubMed ID: 11659798 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Conn v. Conn. Indiana. Supreme Court North East Rep Second Ser; 1988 Jul; 526():958-63. PubMed ID: 12041233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Roe v. Rampton. 17 Jan 1975. U.S. District Court, D. Utah, Central Division Fed Suppl; 1975; 394():677-93. PubMed ID: 11645995 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Paternal child-support tort parallel for the abortion on maternal demand era: the work of Regan, Levy, and Duncan. Swan GS Glendale Law Rev; 1981-1982; 5(2):151-87. PubMed ID: 11652440 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Parental notification: a state-created obstacle to a minor woman's right of privacy. Bush SA Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 1982; 12(3):579-603. PubMed ID: 11655618 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Workability of the undue burden test. Schneider EA Temple Law Rev; 1993; 66(3):1003-37. PubMed ID: 11659882 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]