These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12038358)
21. Donaldson v. O'Connor: constitutional right to treatment for the involuntary civilly committed. Jernigan LT North Carol Centr Law J; 1975; 7(1):174-86. PubMed ID: 11664561 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. A model state law on civil commitment of the mentally ill. Stromberg CD; Stone AA Harvard J Legis; 1983; 20(2):275-396. PubMed ID: 11658832 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Constitutional law--due process--involuntarily civilly committed mental patients have a constitutional right to treatment. Johnson RM; Wehrle-Einhorn RJ Univ Kans Law Rev; 1974; 23(1):188-205. PubMed ID: 11664536 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The 1983 revision of the Texas mental health code. Dix GE St Marys Law J; 1984; 16(1):41-153. PubMed ID: 11658786 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. O'Connor v. Donaldson: a defacto right to treatment? Welch S Law Psychol Rev; 1977; 3():99-106. PubMed ID: 11665183 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. In search of a sane commitment statute. Treffert DA; Krajeck RW Psychiatr Ann; 1976 Jun; 6(6):56-57+. PubMed ID: 11662296 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Constitutionally guaranteed rights of the mentally ill. Cazalas M South Univ Law Rev; 1975; 2(1):9-38. PubMed ID: 12083089 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. o'Connor v. Donaldson: one flew out of the cuckoo's nest. Roberts SD Mont Law Rev; 1976; 37(1):227-37. PubMed ID: 11664762 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The significance for psychology of O'Connor v. Donaldson. Bernard JL Am Psychol; 1977 Dec; 32(12):1085-8. PubMed ID: 596714 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Legal rights of the mentally impaired. Dowben C Houst Law Rev; 1979 May; 16(4):833-901. PubMed ID: 11651659 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Commonwealth v. Lamb. 6 May 1974. Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court, Suffolk North East Rep Second Ser; 1974; 311():47-51. PubMed ID: 12038331 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The right to refuse treatment: mental patients and the law. Wade MD Detroit Coll Law Rev; 1976; 1976(1):53-81. PubMed ID: 11664700 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Amicus curiae brief in the Donaldson case. American Psychiatric Association Am J Psychiatry; 1975 Jan; 132(1):109-15. PubMed ID: 11643354 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Civil commitment in Alabama. Segall RD Ala Law Rev; 1977; 26(1):215-71. PubMed ID: 11664721 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Revising Pennsylvania's involuntary civil commitment statute. Vater JA Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1975; 37(1):180-93. PubMed ID: 11664513 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Legal problems involved in implementing the right to treatment. Morris GH Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1973 Jan; 1(1):1-37. PubMed ID: 11664496 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. E.H. v. Matin. West Virginia. Supreme Court of Appeals South East Report Second Ser; 1981 Nov; 284():232-41. PubMed ID: 12041312 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Constitutional requirements in the commitment of the mentally ill in the U.S.A.: rights to liberty and therapy. Flaschner FN Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 1974; 18(3):283-301. PubMed ID: 11664409 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. "Crazy" until proven innocent? Civil commitment of the mentally ill homeless. Kaufman MS Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1988; 19(2):333-67. PubMed ID: 11659184 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Civil commitment of the mentally ill in California: the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act. Hart MA Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1974 Feb; 7(1):93-136. PubMed ID: 11664312 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]