These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12038366)

  • 1. Maher v. Roe. 20 Jun 1977.
    U.S. Supreme Court
    U S Rep U S Supreme Court; 1977; 432():464-90. PubMed ID: 12038366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of recent Medicaid decisions on a constitutional right: abortions only for the rich?
    Lalli MA
    Fordham Urban Law J; 1978; 6(3):687-710. PubMed ID: 11663905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Denial of public funds for nontherapeutic abortions.
    Stingle KD
    Conn Law Rev; 1978; 10(2):487-510. PubMed ID: 11663904
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. State limitations upon the availability and accessibility of abortions after Wade and Bolton.
    Finn J
    Univ Kans Law Rev; 1976; 25(1):87-107. PubMed ID: 11663734
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of public abortion funding decisions on indigent women: a proposal to reform state statutory and constitutional abortion funding provisions.
    Corns CA
    Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1991; 24(2):371-403. PubMed ID: 11656224
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Losing the negative right of privacy: building sexual and reproductive freedom.
    Copelon R
    Rev Law Soc Change; 1990-1991; 18(1):15-50. PubMed ID: 11656169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The right to Medicaid payment for abortion.
    Butler PA
    Hastings Law J; 1977 Mar; 28(4):931-77. PubMed ID: 11663756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Amendment No. 336.
    Bartlett DF
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1975 Apr; 121(55):S5708-30. PubMed ID: 11663619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. beal v. Doe, Maher v. Roe, and non-therapeutic abortions: the state does not have to pay the bill.
    Norman AB
    Loyola Univ Chic Law J; 1977; 9(1):288-311. PubMed ID: 11661567
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Roe v. Norton. 31 Dec 1975.
    U.S. District Court, D. Connecticut
    Fed Suppl; 1975; 408():660-5. PubMed ID: 11645998
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Committee to Defend Reproductive Rights v. Myers: abortion funding restrictions as an unconstitutional condition.
    Sherman CW
    Calif Law Rev; 1982 Jul; 70(4):978-1013. PubMed ID: 11655731
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Medicaid assistance for elective abortions: the statutory and constitutional issues.
    Unger ZM
    St Johns Law Rev; 1976; 50(4):751-70. PubMed ID: 11663170
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Supreme Court on abortion funding: the second time around.
    Horan DJ; Marzen TJ
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1981; 25(2):411-27. PubMed ID: 11655812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The right to abortion under Medicaid.
    Butler PA
    Clgh Rev; 1974 Apr; 7(12):713-20. PubMed ID: 11663473
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A lesson in judicial abdication: Roe v. Arizona Board of Regents and the right of privacy.
    Sirkis JE
    Ariz State Law J; 1976; 1976(3):499-524. PubMed ID: 11663820
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Abortion and the indigent.
    Altman A
    J Soc Philos; 1980 Jan; 11(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 11655611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Roe v. Norton. 12 Jun 1974.
    U.S. District Court, D. Connecticut
    Fed Suppl; 1974; 380():726-31. PubMed ID: 11645944
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Committee to Defend Reproductive Rights v. Myers: procreative choice guaranteed for all women.
    Erca A
    Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 1982; 12(3):691-716. PubMed ID: 11655619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hope v. Perales: expanding medically necessary abortion rights of pregnant indigent women under New York and Nebraska state constitutional due process clauses.
    Brown M
    Neb Law Rev; 1993; 72(2):586-607. PubMed ID: 11656347
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Beal v. Doe. 20 Jun 1977.
    U.S. Supreme Court
    U S Rep U S Supreme Court; 1977; 432():438-63. PubMed ID: 12038365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.