These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12038373)

  • 1. Harris v. McRae. 30 Jun 1980.
    U.S. Supreme Court
    U S Rep U S Supreme Court; 1980; 448():297-357. PubMed ID: 12038373
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Constitutional law--United States Supreme Court upholds the constitutionality of the Hyde Amendment...--Harris v. McRae, 100 S.Ct. 2671 (1980).
    Barnett BA
    Temple Law Q; 1981; 54(1):109-44. PubMed ID: 11655628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Williams v. Zbaraz. 30 Jun 1980.
    U.S. Supreme Court
    U S Rep U S Supreme Court; 1980; 448():358-70. PubMed ID: 12038370
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Harris v. McRae: the Court retreats from Roe v. Wade.
    Brock VM
    Loyola Law Rev; 1980; 26(3):749-60. PubMed ID: 11664179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Public funding of medically necessary abortions is not required under the Medicaid Act: Harris v. McRae, 100 S.Ct. 2671 (1980).
    Gray AD
    Tex Tech Law Rev; 1981; 12(2):483-99. PubMed ID: 11655635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Harris v. McRae: the Hyde Amendment stands while rights of poor women fall.
    Sewell CC; Wetterer MA
    KY Law J; 1980-1981; 69(2):359-91. PubMed ID: 11655486
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Abortion funding and wise social policy: implications of Harris v. McRae.
    Gold RB
    Women Health; 1980; 5(4):79-83. PubMed ID: 11655640
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Women's Health Services v. Maher.
    U.S. District Court, D. Connecticut
    Fed Suppl; 1981 May; 514():265-76. PubMed ID: 11648347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Amendment No. 2413 [(abortion funding[.
    Weicker LP
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1980 Sep; 126(152):S13703-11. PubMed ID: 11664172
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Constitutional law--abortion funding and the demise of the maternal health consideration--Harris v. McRae, 100 S.Ct. 2671 (1980).
    Libby FA
    Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1981 Apr; 15(2):285-305. PubMed ID: 11655650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The racially disparate impact of restrictions on the public funding of abortion: an analysis of current equal protection doctrine.
    Baron DR
    Boston Coll Third World Law J; 1993; 13(1):1-61. PubMed ID: 11656354
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Poor women get word on health from Court.
    Mann J
    Washington Post; 1980 Jul; ():B1, B3. PubMed ID: 11647332
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Constitutional law--health law--constitutionality of the Hyde Amendment--medically necessary abortions need not be funded by the state or federal government under Medicaid--Harris v. McRae, 448 U.S. 297 (1980).
    Brath MS
    Whittier Law Rev; 1981; 3(3):381-408. PubMed ID: 11655629
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Hyde Amendment and Medicaid abortions.
    Gunty S
    Forum; 1981; 16(4):825-40. PubMed ID: 11651839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Denied abortions mean suffering to the needy.
    Mann J
    Washington Post; 1980 Apr; ():C1, C3. PubMed ID: 11647334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Harris v. McRae: whatever happened to the Roe v. Wade abortion right?
    Crocker L
    Pepperdine Law Rev; 1981; 8(3):861-97. PubMed ID: 11650497
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Doe v. Rose. 27 Jun 1974.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
    Fed Report; 1974; 499():1112-7. PubMed ID: 11645988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Justices rule abortion not a state-paid right.
    Barbash F
    Washington Post; 1980 Jul; ():A1, A8. PubMed ID: 11647329
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Abortion policy: ideology, political cleavage and the policy process.
    Palley HA
    Policy Stud J; 1978; 7(2):224-33. PubMed ID: 11664032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Roe v. Norton. 31 Dec 1975.
    U.S. District Court, D. Connecticut
    Fed Suppl; 1975; 408():660-5. PubMed ID: 11645998
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.