These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12038377)
1. Bly v. Rhoads. 5 Mar 1976. Virginia. Supreme Court South East Report Second Ser; 1976; 222():783-9. PubMed ID: 12038377 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Canterbury v. Spence--the case and a few comments. Murphy WJ Forum; 1976; 11(3):716-26. PubMed ID: 11664620 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Survey of Washington law: informed consent needed for medical treatment. Gonzaga Law Rev; 1974; 10(1):204-10. PubMed ID: 11664423 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Walker v. North Dakota Eye Clinic, Ltd. 12 Jul 1976. U.S. District Court, D. North Dakota, Northeastern Division Fed Suppl; 1976; 415():891-5. PubMed ID: 11646065 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Bowers v. Garfield. 17 Sep 1974. U.S. District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Fed Suppl; 1974; 382():503-10. PubMed ID: 11646043 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Medical malpractice: informed consent cases in "full-disclosure" jurisdictions. Seidelson DE Duquesne Law Rev; 1976; 14(3):309-47. PubMed ID: 11664631 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A new standard for informed consent in medical malpractice cases--the role of the expert witness. Kopis WF St Louis Univ Law J; 1973; 18(2):256-69. PubMed ID: 11664280 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Torts--medical malpractice--Court of Appeals of Maryland adopts doctrine of informed consent. Penhallegon JR Univ Baltimore Law Rev; 1978; 8(1):114-29. PubMed ID: 11664978 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Medical malpractice: the right to be informed. Kessenick LW; Mankin PA Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1973; 8(2):261-81. PubMed ID: 11664405 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Informed consent liability. Recher BC Drake Law Rev; 1976; 26(3):696-715. PubMed ID: 11664787 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The standard of disclosure by physicians to patients: competing models of informed consent. Halligan PD LA Law Rev; 1980; 41(1):9-67. PubMed ID: 11665275 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The doctrines of lack of consent and lack of informed consent in medical procedures in Louisiana. Boland GL LA Law Rev; 1983 Sep; 45(1):1-38. PubMed ID: 11658587 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The evolution of the doctrine of informed consent. Georgia Law Rev; 1978; 12(3):581-611. PubMed ID: 11664967 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Reibl v. Hughes. Canada. Supreme Court Dom Law Rep; 1980 Oct; 114():1-35. PubMed ID: 12041068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Informed consent in New York under the Medical Malpractice Insurance Act. Rosen MW Hofstra Law Rev; 1976; 4(3):701-27. PubMed ID: 11664598 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. New trends in informed consent? Jaeckel LB Neb Law Rev; 1975; 54(1):66-92. PubMed ID: 11664487 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The doctrine of informed consent--fact or fiction? Markham BB Forum; 1975; 10(3):1073-9. PubMed ID: 11664458 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Medical risks, patients' rights, and the inadequacies of the negligence action. Martin R Hong Kong Law J; 1985 May; 15(2):150-66. PubMed ID: 11658882 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Modern status of views as to general measure of physician's duty to inform patient of risks of proposed treatment. Frantz LB Am Law Rep ALR 3rd Cases Annot; 1978; 88():1008-44. PubMed ID: 12091933 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]