These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12038386)

  • 1. Abortion and sterilization.
    Pennsylvania. Attorney General
    Pa Dist Cty Rep; 1975; 70():694-701. PubMed ID: 12038386
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Abortion, conscience and the Constitution: an examination of federal institutional conscience clauses.
    Pilpel HF; Patton DE
    Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1974 Fall-1975 Winter; 6(2):279-305. PubMed ID: 11663597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does the state action doctrine compel nominally private hospitals to make abortion services available despite "conscience clauses".
    Shuger NB
    Md Law Forum; 1974; 4(3):113-24. PubMed ID: 11663479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Constitutional law--abortion--private hospital may refuse to perform abortion.
    Berger B
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1974; 18(3):440-60. PubMed ID: 11663525
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. State limitations upon the availability and accessibility of abortions after Wade and Bolton.
    Finn J
    Univ Kans Law Rev; 1976; 25(1):87-107. PubMed ID: 11663734
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hathaway v. Worcester City Hospital--the right to be sterilized.
    Olshin L
    Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(2):403-12. PubMed ID: 11663627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The consent question--parental and spousal consent for abortions.
    Davis CD
    Tex Hosp; 1976 Sep; 32(9):27-30. PubMed ID: 11664739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sterilization in Pennsylvania.
    Beck PW; Soskis CW
    Temple Law Q; 1981; 54(2):213-36. PubMed ID: 11652406
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Doe v. Charleston Area Medical Center, Inc. 6 Nov 1975.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
    Fed Report; 1975; 529():638-45. PubMed ID: 11645950
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The law of fertility regulation in the United States: a 1980 review.
    Isaacs SL
    J Fam Law; 1980-1981; 19(1):65-96. PubMed ID: 11663114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hill-Burton hospitals after Roe and Doe: can federally funded hospitals refuse to perform abortions?
    Berl EL
    Rev Law Soc Change; 1974; 4(1):83-97. PubMed ID: 11663526
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Doe v. Bridgeton Hospital Association, Inc. 7 Oct 1974.
    New Jersey. Superior Court, Law Division
    Atl Report; 1974; 327():448-62. PubMed ID: 11645992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Michigan Abortion Refusal Act.
    White GM
    Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1975; 8(3):659-75. PubMed ID: 11663576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Survey of abortion law.
    Platt JG; O'Malley K
    Ariz State Law J; 1980; 1980(1):67-216. PubMed ID: 11655392
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Abortion: state action.
    Womens Rights Law Report; 1977; 3(3-4):162-9. PubMed ID: 11663757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Supreme Court on abortion funding: the second time around.
    Horan DJ; Marzen TJ
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1981; 25(2):411-27. PubMed ID: 11655812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The "right" of abortion funding.
    Noonan JT
    Hum Life Rev; 1981; 7(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 11651720
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Implications of the abortion decisions: post Roe and Doe litigation and legislation.
    Wasserman R
    Columbia Law Rev; 1974 Mar; 74(2):237-68. PubMed ID: 11664412
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Abortion regulation: Louisiana's abortive attempt.
    Vance RP
    LA Law Rev; 1974; 34(3):676-85. PubMed ID: 11663504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A lesson in judicial abdication: Roe v. Arizona Board of Regents and the right of privacy.
    Sirkis JE
    Ariz State Law J; 1976; 1976(3):499-524. PubMed ID: 11663820
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.