254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12038913)
1. Author perception of peer review: impact of review quality and acceptance on satisfaction.
Weber EJ; Katz PP; Waeckerle JF; Callaham ML
JAMA; 2002 Jun; 287(21):2790-3. PubMed ID: 12038913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Does masking author identity improve peer review quality? A randomized controlled trial. PEER Investigators.
Justice AC; Cho MK; Winker MA; Berlin JA; Rennie D
JAMA; 1998 Jul; 280(3):240-2. PubMed ID: 9676668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Author perception of peer review.
Gibson M; Spong CY; Simonsen SE; Martin S; Scott JR
Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 112(3):646-52. PubMed ID: 18757664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differences in review quality and recommendations for publication between peer reviewers suggested by authors or by editors.
Schroter S; Tite L; Hutchings A; Black N
JAMA; 2006 Jan; 295(3):314-7. PubMed ID: 16418467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing the quality of the peer review process: author and editorial board member perspectives.
Bunner C; Larson EL
Am J Infect Control; 2012 Oct; 40(8):701-4. PubMed ID: 23021414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of acceptance or rejection on the author's evaluation of peer review of medical manuscripts.
Garfunkel JM; Lawson EE; Hamrick HJ; Ulshen MH
JAMA; 1990 Mar; 263(10):1376-8. PubMed ID: 2304217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. What is submitted and what gets accepted in Indian Pediatrics: analysis of submissions, review process, decision making, and criteria for rejection.
Gupta P; Kaur G; Sharma B; Shah D; Choudhury P
Indian Pediatr; 2006 Jun; 43(6):479-89. PubMed ID: 16820657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Peer-review and editorial process of the Ethiopian Medical Journal: ten years assessment of the status of submitted manuscripts.
Enquselassie F
Ethiop Med J; 2013 Apr; 51(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 24079153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fate of manuscripts rejected from the Red Journal.
Holliday EB; Yang G; Jagsi R; Hoffman KE; Bennett KE; Grace C; Zietman AL
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Jan; 91(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 25835616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of the Revision Process by American Journal of Roentgenology Reviewers and Section Editors: Metrics of Rejected Manuscripts and Their Final Disposition.
Cejas C
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jun; 208(6):1181-1184. PubMed ID: 28350482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. What happens to medical articles submitted in Spanish that are not accepted for publication?
Matías-Guiu JA; García-Ramos R; Castellanos M; Martínez-Vila E; Matías-Guiu J
Neurologia; 2013 May; 28(4):205-11. PubMed ID: 22795919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Early editorial manuscript screening versus obligate peer review: a randomized trial.
Johnston SC; Lowenstein DH; Ferriero DM; Messing RO; Oksenberg JR; Hauser SL
Ann Neurol; 2007 Apr; 61(4):A10-2. PubMed ID: 17444512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How statistical expertise is used in medical research.
Altman DG; Goodman SN; Schroter S
JAMA; 2002 Jun; 287(21):2817-20. PubMed ID: 12038922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The fate of manuscripts rejected by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume).
Okike K; Kocher MS; Nwachukwu BU; Mehlman CT; Heckman JD; Bhandari M
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Sep; 94(17):e130. PubMed ID: 22992859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Authors' and editors' perspectives on peer review quality in three scholarly nursing journals.
Shattell MM; Chinn P; Thomas SP; Cowling WR
J Nurs Scholarsh; 2010 Mar; 42(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 20487187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reviewer selection biases editorial decisions on manuscripts.
Hausmann L; Schweitzer B; Middleton FA; Schulz JB
J Neurochem; 2018 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 29377133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Acceptance rates for manuscripts submitted to veterinary peer-reviewed journals in 2012.
Lamb CR; Adams CA
Equine Vet J; 2015 Nov; 47(6):736-40. PubMed ID: 25302854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the quality and subsequent performance of manuscripts rejected by Clinical Rheumatology: a research report.
Barajas-Ochoa A; Cisneros-Barrios A; Ramos-Remus C
Clin Rheumatol; 2022 Aug; 41(8):2541-2551. PubMed ID: 35698009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fate of Manuscripts Rejected by a Specialty Psychiatry Journal: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Menon V; Jayaprakashan KP; Varadharajan N; Ameen S; Praharaj SK
Indian J Psychol Med; 2022 Sep; 44(5):493-498. PubMed ID: 36157014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis of the study design and manuscript deficiencies in research articles submitted to Emergency Medicine.
Taylor DM; Brown AF
Emerg Med (Fremantle); 2001 Dec; 13(4):444-50. PubMed ID: 11903429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
