BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12038916)

  • 1. Discussion sections in reports of controlled trials published in general medical journals.
    Clarke M; Alderson P; Chalmers I
    JAMA; 2002 Jun; 287(21):2799-801. PubMed ID: 12038916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reports of clinical trials should begin and end with up-to-date systematic reviews of other relevant evidence: a status report.
    Clarke M; Hopewell S; Chalmers I
    J R Soc Med; 2007 Apr; 100(4):187-90. PubMed ID: 17404342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Discussion sections in reports of controlled trials published in general medical journals: islands in search of continents?
    Clarke M; Chalmers I
    JAMA; 1998 Jul; 280(3):280-2. PubMed ID: 9676682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A survey of prevalence of narrative and systematic reviews in five major medical journals.
    Faggion CM; Bakas NP; Wasiak J
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):176. PubMed ID: 29281975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reporting quality of randomised controlled trial abstracts among high-impact general medical journals: a review and analysis.
    Hays M; Andrews M; Wilson R; Callender D; O'Malley PG; Douglas K
    BMJ Open; 2016 Jul; 6(7):e011082. PubMed ID: 27470506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The scatter of research: cross sectional comparison of randomised trials and systematic reviews across specialties.
    Hoffmann T; Erueti C; Thorning S; Glasziou P
    BMJ; 2012 May; 344():e3223. PubMed ID: 22597353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Value of flow diagrams in reports of randomized controlled trials.
    Egger M; Jüni P; Bartlett C;
    JAMA; 2001 Apr; 285(15):1996-9. PubMed ID: 11308437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Authorship criteria and disclosure of contributions: comparison of 3 general medical journals with different author contribution forms.
    Bates T; Anić A; Marusić M; Marusić A
    JAMA; 2004 Jul; 292(1):86-8. PubMed ID: 15238595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Conflicts of interest at medical journals: the influence of industry-supported randomised trials on journal impact factors and revenue - cohort study.
    Lundh A; Barbateskovic M; Hróbjartsson A; Gøtzsche PC
    PLoS Med; 2010 Oct; 7(10):e1000354. PubMed ID: 21048986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Trends in High-Impact Neurosurgical Randomized Controlled Trials Published in General Medical Journals: A Systematic Review.
    Karhade AV; Senders JT; Martin E; Muskens IS; Zaidi HA; Broekman MLD; Smith TR
    World Neurosurg; 2019 Sep; 129():e158-e170. PubMed ID: 31108256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials of pharmacologic treatment of bipolar disorders: a systematic review.
    Strech D; Soltmann B; Weikert B; Bauer M; Pfennig A
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2011 Sep; 72(9):1214-21. PubMed ID: 21294992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Characteristics of qualitative studies in influential journals of general medicine: a critical review.
    Yamazaki H; Slingsby BT; Takahashi M; Hayashi Y; Sugimori H; Nakayama T
    Biosci Trends; 2009 Dec; 3(6):202-9. PubMed ID: 20103848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of reports of randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in surgical journals: literature review.
    Panesar SS; Thakrar R; Athanasiou T; Sheikh A
    J R Soc Med; 2006 Sep; 99(9):470-2. PubMed ID: 16946391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Generalizability of findings from systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the Leading General Medical Journals.
    Malmivaara A
    J Rehabil Med; 2020 Mar; 52(3):jrm00031. PubMed ID: 32103277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reporting of informed consent and ethics committee approval in clinical trials.
    Yank V; Rennie D
    JAMA; 2002 Jun; 287(21):2835-8. PubMed ID: 12038927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Brief report: inadequate description and discussion of enrolled patient characteristics and potential inter-study site differences in reports of randomized controlled trials: a systematic survey in six rheumatology journals.
    Yurdakul S; Mustafa BN; Fresko I; Seyahi E; Yazici H
    Arthritis Rheumatol; 2014 May; 66(5):1395-9. PubMed ID: 24782196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Global collaborative networks on meta-analyses of randomized trials published in high impact factor medical journals: a social network analysis.
    Catalá-López F; Alonso-Arroyo A; Hutton B; Aleixandre-Benavent R; Moher D
    BMC Med; 2014 Jan; 12():15. PubMed ID: 24476131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Availability of study protocols for randomized trials published in high-impact medical journals: A cross-sectional analysis.
    Spence O; Hong K; Onwuchekwa Uba R; Doshi P
    Clin Trials; 2020 Feb; 17(1):99-105. PubMed ID: 31450958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Extrapolation of correlation between 2 variables in 4 general medical journals.
    Kuo YH
    JAMA; 2002 Jun; 287(21):2815-7. PubMed ID: 12038921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Side effects are incompletely reported among systematic reviews in gastroenterology.
    Mahady SE; Schlub T; Bero L; Moher D; Tovey D; George J; Craig JC
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Feb; 68(2):144-53. PubMed ID: 25124168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.