603 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12038932)
1. Comparison of review articles published in peer-reviewed and throwaway journals.
Rochon PA; Bero LA; Bay AM; Gold JL; Dergal JM; Binns MA; Streiner DL; Gurwitz JH
JAMA; 2002 Jun; 287(21):2853-6. PubMed ID: 12038932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prevalence of articles with honorary authors and ghost authors in peer-reviewed medical journals.
Flanagin A; Carey LA; Fontanarosa PB; Phillips SG; Pace BP; Lundberg GD; Rennie D
JAMA; 1998 Jul; 280(3):222-4. PubMed ID: 9676661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact Factors and Prediction of Popular Topics in a Journal.
Nielsen MB; Seitz K
Ultraschall Med; 2016 Aug; 37(4):343-5. PubMed ID: 27490462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An analysis of review articles published in primary care journals.
Silagy CA
Fam Pract; 1993 Sep; 10(3):337-41. PubMed ID: 8282163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Defining the publication source of high-quality evidence in urology: an analysis of EvidenceUpdates.
Narayan VM; Chrouser K; Haynes RB; Parrish R; Dahm P
BJU Int; 2016 Jun; 117(6):861-6. PubMed ID: 26663761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Second-order peer review of the medical literature for clinical practitioners.
Haynes RB; Cotoi C; Holland J; Walters L; Wilczynski N; Jedraszewski D; McKinlay J; Parrish R; McKibbon KA;
JAMA; 2006 Apr; 295(15):1801-8. PubMed ID: 16622142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis of the Revision Process by American Journal of Roentgenology Reviewers and Section Editors: Metrics of Rejected Manuscripts and Their Final Disposition.
Cejas C
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jun; 208(6):1181-1184. PubMed ID: 28350482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Information excess in medicine. Overview, relevance to dermatology, and strategies for coping.
Arndt KA
Arch Dermatol; 1992 Sep; 128(9):1249-56. PubMed ID: 1519941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cochrane Skin Group systematic reviews are more methodologically rigorous than other systematic reviews in dermatology.
Collier A; Heilig L; Schilling L; Williams H; Dellavalle RP
Br J Dermatol; 2006 Dec; 155(6):1230-5. PubMed ID: 17107394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Readers' evaluation of effect of peer review and editing on quality of articles in the Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde.
Pierie JP; Walvoort HC; Overbeke AJ
Lancet; 1996 Nov; 348(9040):1480-3. PubMed ID: 8942777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The fate of manuscripts rejected by a general medical journal.
Ray J; Berkwits M; Davidoff F
Am J Med; 2000 Aug; 109(2):131-5. PubMed ID: 10967154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A survey of prevalence of narrative and systematic reviews in five major medical journals.
Faggion CM; Bakas NP; Wasiak J
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):176. PubMed ID: 29281975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The distribution of forensic journals, reflections on authorship practices, peer-review and role of the impact factor.
Jones AW
Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Jan; 165(2-3):115-28. PubMed ID: 16784827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Role of supplementary material in biomedical journal articles: surveys of authors, reviewers and readers.
Price A; Schroter S; Clarke M; McAneney H
BMJ Open; 2018 Sep; 8(9):e021753. PubMed ID: 30249629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Methodology and reports of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: a comparison of Cochrane reviews with articles published in paper-based journals.
Jadad AR; Cook DJ; Jones A; Klassen TP; Tugwell P; Moher M; Moher D
JAMA; 1998 Jul; 280(3):278-80. PubMed ID: 9676681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Peer review in journals indexed in Index Medicus.
Colaianni LA
JAMA; 1994 Jul; 272(2):156-8. PubMed ID: 8015132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Scientific quality of original research articles on environmental tobacco smoke.
Barnes DE; Bero LA
Tob Control; 1997; 6(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 9176982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality of articles published in predatory nursing journals.
Oermann MH; Nicoll LH; Chinn PL; Ashton KS; Conklin JL; Edie AH; Amarasekara S; Williams BL
Nurs Outlook; 2018; 66(1):4-10. PubMed ID: 28641868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A citation analysis of the impact of blinded peer review.
Laband DN; Piette MJ
JAMA; 1994 Jul; 272(2):147-9. PubMed ID: 8015128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [The "impact factor" and the impact of medical journals].
Reyes H
Rev Med Chil; 1998 Feb; 126(2):135-8. PubMed ID: 9659746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
