321 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12040855)
1. Aspects in mammographic screening. Detection, prediction, recurrence and prognosis.
Thurfjell MG
Acta Radiol Suppl; 2001 Dec; 42(424):1-22. PubMed ID: 12040855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Nonpalpable breast cancer: mammographic appearance as predictor of histologic type.
Thurfjell MG; Lindgren A; Thurfjell E
Radiology; 2002 Jan; 222(1):165-70. PubMed ID: 11756721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mammographic finding as predictor of survival in 1-9 mm invasive breast cancers. worse prognosis for cases presenting as calcifications alone.
Thurfjell E; Thurfjell MG; Lindgren A
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2001 May; 67(2):177-80. PubMed ID: 11519866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Screening mammography-detected cancers: sensitivity of a computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms.
Yang SK; Moon WK; Cho N; Park JS; Cha JH; Kim SM; Kim SJ; Im JG
Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 17507722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prospective assessment of computer-aided detection in interpretation of screening mammography.
Ko JM; Nicholas MJ; Mendel JB; Slanetz PJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Dec; 187(6):1483-91. PubMed ID: 17114541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mammographic features of local recurrence in women who have undergone breast-conserving therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ.
Liberman L; Van Zee KJ; Dershaw DD; Morris EA; Abramson AF; Samli B
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Feb; 168(2):489-93. PubMed ID: 9016233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mammographic features of local recurrence after conservative surgery and radiation therapy: comparison with that of the primary tumor.
Günhan-Bilgen I; Oktay A
Acta Radiol; 2007 May; 48(4):390-7. PubMed ID: 17453518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Recurrent cancer after breast-conserving surgery with radiation therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ: mammographic features, method of detection, and stage of recurrence.
Pinsky RW; Rebner M; Pierce LJ; Ben-David MA; Vicini F; Hunt KA; Helvie MA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Jul; 189(1):140-4. PubMed ID: 17579163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mammographic appearance of nonpalpable breast cancer reflects pathologic characteristics.
Gajdos C; Tartter PI; Bleiweiss IJ; Hermann G; de Csepel J; Estabrook A; Rademaker AW
Ann Surg; 2002 Feb; 235(2):246-51. PubMed ID: 11807365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mammography screening methods and diagnostic results.
Thurfjell E
Acta Radiol Suppl; 1995; 395():1-22. PubMed ID: 7839866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sensitivity and specificity of computer-assisted breast cancer detection in mammography screening.
Thurfjell E; Thurfjell MG; Egge E; Bjurstam N
Acta Radiol; 1998 Jul; 39(4):384-8. PubMed ID: 9685824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection.
Birdwell RL; Ikeda DM; O'Shaughnessy KF; Sickles EA
Radiology; 2001 Apr; 219(1):192-202. PubMed ID: 11274556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sensitivity of noncommercial computer-aided detection system for mammographic breast cancer detection: pilot clinical trial.
Helvie MA; Hadjiiski L; Makariou E; Chan HP; Petrick N; Sahiner B; Lo SC; Freedman M; Adler D; Bailey J; Blane C; Hoff D; Hunt K; Joynt L; Klein K; Paramagul C; Patterson SK; Roubidoux MA
Radiology; 2004 Apr; 231(1):208-14. PubMed ID: 14990808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Critical review of 215 cases of non-palpable mammary lesions].
Pastore G; Marano P; Romani M; Costantini M; Belli P
Radiol Med; 1999 May; 97(5):344-8. PubMed ID: 10432964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mammographically detected, clinically occult ductal carcinoma in situ treated with breast-conserving surgery and definitive breast irradiation.
Solin LJ; McCormick B; Recht A; Haffty BG; Taylor ME; Kuske RR; Bornstein BA; McNeese M; Schultz DJ; Fowble BL; Barrett W; Yeh IT; Kurtz JM; Amalric R; Fourquet A
Cancer J Sci Am; 1996; 2(3):158-65. PubMed ID: 9166516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computer-aided detection output on 172 subtle findings on normal mammograms previously obtained in women with breast cancer detected at follow-up screening mammography.
Ikeda DM; Birdwell RL; O'Shaughnessy KF; Sickles EA; Brenner RJ
Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):811-9. PubMed ID: 14764891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Can computer-aided detection with double reading of screening mammograms help decrease the false-negative rate? Initial experience.
Destounis SV; DiNitto P; Logan-Young W; Bonaccio E; Zuley ML; Willison KM
Radiology; 2004 Aug; 232(2):578-84. PubMed ID: 15229350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mammographic tumor features can predict long-term outcomes reliably in women with 1-14-mm invasive breast carcinoma.
Tabar L; Tony Chen HH; Amy Yen MF; Tot T; Tung TH; Chen LS; Chiu YH; Duffy SW; Smith RA
Cancer; 2004 Oct; 101(8):1745-59. PubMed ID: 15386334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of mammographic parenchymal pattern in screening-detected and interval invasive breast cancers on pathologic features, mammographic features, and patient survival.
Porter GJ; Evans AJ; Cornford EJ; Burrell HC; James JJ; Lee AH; Chakrabarti J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Mar; 188(3):676-83. PubMed ID: 17312053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Outcome and prognostic factors for local recurrence in mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast treated with conservative surgery and radiation therapy.
White J; Levine A; Gustafson G; Wimbish K; Ingold J; Pettinga J; Matter R; Martinez A; Vicini F
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Feb; 31(4):791-7. PubMed ID: 7860390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
