181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12041069)
21. Court says doctors were right to treat Jehovah's Witness.
Dyer C
BMJ; 1992 Aug; 305(6848):272. PubMed ID: 11643026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The approach to the Jehovah's Witness patient.
Rothenberg DM
Anesthesiol Clin North Am; 1990 Sep; 8(3):589-607. PubMed ID: 11653928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. In re Guardianship of L.S. and H.S.
Nevada. Supreme Court
Wests Pac Report; 2004; 87():521-7. PubMed ID: 16479694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The conflict between child's medical needs and parents' religious beliefs.
Probst JE
Am J Fam Law; 1990; 4(2):175-92. PubMed ID: 11652023
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Compulsory medical treatment and religious freedom: whose law shall prevail?
Paris JJ
Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1975; 10(1):1-35. PubMed ID: 11661287
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Medical decision making for and by children: tensions between parent, state, and child.
Wadlington W
Univ Ill Law Rev; 1994; 2():311-36. PubMed ID: 11659988
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Mercy Hospital, Inc. v. Jackson: a recurring dilemma for health care providers in the treatment of Jehovah's Witnesses.
Bamberger DH
MD Law Rev; 1987; 46(3):514-32. PubMed ID: 11649934
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Graham v. Deukmejian.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Fed Report; 1983 Aug; 713():518-20. PubMed ID: 11648160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. "In God we trust": when parents refuse medical treatment for their children based upon their sincere religious beliefs.
Plastine LM
Const Law J; 1993; 3(1):123-60. PubMed ID: 12083094
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Abraham, Isaac and the state: faith healing and legal intervention.
Abraham HJ
Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1993; 27(5):951-87. PubMed ID: 11652734
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Jehovah's Witnesses and blood transfusion.
Watson SB
Clin Ethics Rep; 1991; 5(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 11653954
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. In re Estate of Darrell Dorone.
Di Somma AV
Issues Law Med; 1989; 4(4):511-3. PubMed ID: 11644375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Malette v. Shulman.
Canada. Ontario. Supreme Court, Court of Appeal
Dom Law Rep; 1990 Mar; 67():321-39. PubMed ID: 12041075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Malette v. Shulman: the requirement of consent in medical emergencies.
Siebrasse N
McGill Law J; 1989; 34(4):1080-98. PubMed ID: 11659256
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Mercy Hospital v. Jackson.
Maryland. Court of Special Appeals
Atl Report; 1985 Apr; 489():1130-4. PubMed ID: 11648161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Blood transfusions and elective surgery: a custodial function of an Ohio juvenile court.
Zaremski MJ
Clevel State Law Rev; 1974; 23(2):231-44. PubMed ID: 11664328
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Stamford Hospital v. Vega.
Connecticut. Supreme Court
Atl Report; 1996 Apr; 674():821-34. PubMed ID: 11648307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Fosmire v. Nicoleau.
New York. Court of Appeals
North East Rep Second Ser; 1990 Jan; 551():77-89. PubMed ID: 12041192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Praying for relief from parens patriae: should a child be allowed to refuse life-saving medical treatment on religious grounds?
Kessler DN
Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1986; 2(3):673-93. PubMed ID: 11650888
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Parental rights and children's best interests: United States.
McBride G
BMJ; 1990 Jun; 300(6741):1673-4. PubMed ID: 11642789
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
