147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12041074)
1. Nancy B. v. Hôtel-Dieu de Québec.
Canada. Quebec. Superior Court
Dom Law Rep; 1992 Jan; 86():385-95. PubMed ID: 12041074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Medically assisted death: Nancy B. v. Hôtel-Dieu de Québec.
Dickens BM
McGill Law J; 1993; 38():1053-70. PubMed ID: 11652654
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Woman, 25, wins right to die.
Burns JF
N Y Times Web; 1992 Jan; ():A9. PubMed ID: 11646902
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. In re Farrell.
New Jersey. Superior Court, Chancery Division, Ocean County
Atl Report; 1986 Jun; 514():1342-7. PubMed ID: 11648556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bouvia v. Superior Court (Glenchur).
California. Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 2
Wests Calif Report; 1986 Apr; 225():297-308. PubMed ID: 11648237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In re Jane Doe.
Pennsylvania. Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Pa Dist Cty Rep; 1987 Aug; 45():371-90. PubMed ID: 12085890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. HIV disease: criminal and civil liability for assisted suicide.
McCoy AG
Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 1991; 21(1):437-85. PubMed ID: 11659852
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Nutritional discontinuation: active or passive euthanasia?
Banja JD
J Neurosurg Nurs; 1990 Apr; 22(2):117-20. PubMed ID: 11659424
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Foody v. Manchester Memorial Hospital.
Connecticut. Superior Court, Judicial District of Hartford-New Britain at Hartford
Atl Report; 1984 Mar; 482():713-22. PubMed ID: 11648260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Euthanasia and self determinism: is there a Charter right to die in Canada?
Carnerie F
McGill Law J; 1987 Mar; 32(2):299-335. PubMed ID: 11649872
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Bouvia v. Superior Court: the death option.
Voboril LA
Pac Law J; 1987 Apr; 18(3):1029-53. PubMed ID: 11651883
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. "Right to die" -- good slogan, fuzzy thinking.
Kamisar Y
First Things; 1993 Dec; 38():6-9. PubMed ID: 11654085
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Bartling v. Superior Court.
California. Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 5
Wests Calif Report; 1984 Dec; 209():220-7. PubMed ID: 11648164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. People with pipes: a question of euthanasia.
Machler S
Univ Puget Sound Law Rev; 1993; 16(2):781-832. PubMed ID: 11659755
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. In re Farrell.
New Jersey. Supreme Court
Atl Report; 1987 Jun; 529():404-19. PubMed ID: 11648263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bartling v. Glendale Adventist Medical Center.
California. Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 5
Wests Calif Report; 1986 Aug; 229():360-7. PubMed ID: 11648171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of courts in the debate on assisted suicide: a communitarian approach.
Beschle DL
Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1995; 9(2):367-405. PubMed ID: 11653000
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Beyond theological conflict in the courts: the issue of assisted suicide.
Dyck AJ
Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1995; 9(2):503-35. PubMed ID: 11653003
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The legal aspects of the right to die: before and after the Quinlan decision.
Becker D; Fleming R; Overstreet R
KY Law J; 1977; 65(4):823-79. PubMed ID: 11661533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Bouvia v. County of Riverside.
California. Superior Court, County of Riverside
Issues Law Med; 1986 May; 1(6):485-91. PubMed ID: 11644050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
