201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12041085)
1. Hopp v. Lepp.
Canada. Supreme Court
Dom Law Rep; 1980 May; 112():67-83. PubMed ID: 12041085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Informed consent and the disclosure of risks of treatment: the Supreme Court of Canada decides.
Dillon JR
Bioethics Q; 1981; 3(3-4):156-62. PubMed ID: 11649479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reibl v. Hughes.
Canada. Supreme Court
Dom Law Rep; 1980 Oct; 114():1-35. PubMed ID: 12041068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Tort--informed consent--new directions for medical disclosure--Hopp v. Lepp and Reibl v. Hughes.
Gochnauer M; Fleming DJ
Univ B C Law Rev; 1981; 15(2):475-97. PubMed ID: 11658641
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The surgeon's duty to warn of risks: transatlantic approach rejected by Court of Appeal.
Brahams D
Lancet; 1984 Mar; 1(8376):578-9. PubMed ID: 11644281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Lepp v. Hopp; Hopp v. Lepp.
; ;
Leg Med Q; 1980; 4():187-209. PubMed ID: 11645462
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Logan v. Greenwich Hospital Association.
Connecticut. Supreme Court
Atl Report; 1983 Sep; 465():294-308. PubMed ID: 11648514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Consent to medical treatment in Canada.
Picard EI
Osgoode Hall Law J; 1981 Mar; 19(1):140-51. PubMed ID: 11658624
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Hook v. Rothstein.
South Carolina. Court of Appeals
South East Report Second Ser; 1984 Apr; 316():690-705. PubMed ID: 12041306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The doctrines of lack of consent and lack of informed consent in medical procedures in Louisiana.
Boland GL
LA Law Rev; 1983 Sep; 45(1):1-38. PubMed ID: 11658587
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Medical risks, patients' rights, and the inadequacies of the negligence action.
Martin R
Hong Kong Law J; 1985 May; 15(2):150-66. PubMed ID: 11658882
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Hills v. Potter.
Great Britain. England. Queen's Bench Division
All Engl Law Rep; 1983 May; [1983] 3():716-29. PubMed ID: 11648156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cowman v. Hornaday.
Iowa. Supreme Court
Wests North West Rep; 1983 Jan; 329():422-7. PubMed ID: 12041128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Halley v. Birbiglia.
Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court, Worcester
Mass Rep Mass Supreme Judic Court; 1983 Dec; 390():540-50. PubMed ID: 12041108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Medical decision-making: patient participation.
Wolfgarten A; Khan A
Med Leg J; 1984; 52(Pt. 3):180-90. PubMed ID: 11649586
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Dixon v. Peters.
North Carolina. Court of Appeals
South East Report Second Ser; 1983 Sep; 306():477-84. PubMed ID: 12041305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Doctor's duty to answer patients' inquiries.
Brahams D
Lancet; 1987 Apr; 1(8538):932. PubMed ID: 11653070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Perna v. Pirozzi.
New Jersey. Supreme Court
Rep Cases Argued Determ Supreme Court N J N J Supreme Court; 1983 Mar; 92():446-66. PubMed ID: 12041106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The meaning of informed consent.
Whitfield A
Med Leg J; 1986; 54(1):11-25. PubMed ID: 11653740
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Largey v. Rothman.
New Jersey. Supreme Court
Atl Report; 1988 May; 540():504-11. PubMed ID: 11648568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
