160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12041104)
1. Attorney-General (QLD) v. Parents, In re S.
Australia. Family Court
Fed Law Rep; 1989 Nov; 98():41-56. PubMed ID: 12041104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Re Elizabeth (Ross, Jones J.).
Australia. Family Court
Fed Law Rep; 1989; 96():248-67. PubMed ID: 17001809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Re Jane.
Australia. Family Court
Fed Law Rep; 1988 Dec; 94():1-31. PubMed ID: 12041105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sterilization--where mentally retarded and presumably fertile daughter cannot understand or exercise her constitutional right to voluntary sterilization, equity court has jurisdiction to empower parents to exercise right on her behalf.
Fritschner SH
J Fam Law; 1980 Apr; 18(3):648-53. PubMed ID: 11658339
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Re D (A Minor) (Wardship:Sterilisation).
Great Britain. England. High Court of Justice, Family Division
All Engl Law Rep; 1975 Sep; 1976():326-36. PubMed ID: 11648637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Re B (A Minor) (Wardship: Sterilisation).
Great Britain. House of Lords (30 Apr 1987) [and] Court of Appeal, Civil Div. (16 Mar 1987) [and] Family Div. at Newcastle Upon Tyne (20 Jan 1987)
All Engl Law Rep; 1987 Apr; [1987]2():206-19. PubMed ID: 11648560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Exclusive juvenile jurisdiction to authorize sterilization of incompetent minors.
Bays-Beinart DJ
Indiana Law Rev; 1983; 16(4):835-60. PubMed ID: 11658574
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A case-based approach to sterilization of mentally incompetent women.
Keown RM
Princet J Bioeth; 1998; 1(1):94-113. PubMed ID: 11657344
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Treatment without consent: intervention by the court.
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 May; 290(6479):1409-10. PubMed ID: 11658570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Re Eve.
Canada. Supreme Court
Dom Law Rep; 1986 Oct; 31():1-37. PubMed ID: 12041087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sterilization of mentally retarded persons: reproductive rights and family privacy.
Scott ES
Duke Law J; 1986 Nov; 1986(5):806-65. PubMed ID: 11658848
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Limitations on reproductive autonomy for the mentally handicapped.
Smith GP
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1988; 4():71-89. PubMed ID: 11645615
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Re K and Public Trustee.
Canada. British Columbia. Court of Appeal
Dom Law Rep; 1985 May; 19():255-85. PubMed ID: 12041079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Wentzel v. Montgomery General Hospital, Inc.
Maryland. Court of Appeals
Atl Report; 1982 Jul; 447():1244-64. PubMed ID: 11648524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In re Jane, 22 December 1988.
Australia. Family Court
Annu Rev Popul Law; 1988; 15():21-2. PubMed ID: 12289416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sterilization of the mentally retarded minor: the Re K. case.
Finch-Noyes CA
Can J Fam Law; 1986; 5(1):277-99. PubMed ID: 11659190
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Australia's illegal sterilisations revealed.
Cordner S; Ettershank K
Lancet; 1997 Apr; 349(9060):1231. PubMed ID: 11657403
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Minor: consent; sterilisation; best interests -- L and G.M. v. M.M.: The Director-General, Department of Family Services and Aboriginal and Islander Affairs.
Kennedy I
Med Law Rev; 1995; 3(1):94-7. PubMed ID: 11656730
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Voluntary sterilization for persons with mental disabilities: the need for legislation.
Burnett BA
Syracuse Law Rev; 1981; 32(4):913-55. PubMed ID: 11658516
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. In re Guardianship of Eberhardy: the sterilization of the mentally retarded.
Derouin J
Wis L Rev; 1982; 1982(6):1199-227. PubMed ID: 11651835
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
