198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12041105)
1. Re Jane.
Australia. Family Court
Fed Law Rep; 1988 Dec; 94():1-31. PubMed ID: 12041105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sterilisation of mentally handicapped people: judges rule ok?
Shaw J
Mod Law Rev; 1990 Jan; 53(1):91-106. PubMed ID: 11659259
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A case-based approach to sterilization of mentally incompetent women.
Keown RM
Princet J Bioeth; 1998; 1(1):94-113. PubMed ID: 11657344
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Attorney-General (QLD) v. Parents, In re S.
Australia. Family Court
Fed Law Rep; 1989 Nov; 98():41-56. PubMed ID: 12041104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Exclusive juvenile jurisdiction to authorize sterilization of incompetent minors.
Bays-Beinart DJ
Indiana Law Rev; 1983; 16(4):835-60. PubMed ID: 11658574
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Consent to medical procedures and the Protection of Personal and Property Rights Act 1988.
Grant E
Otago Law Rev; 1989; 7(1):161-78. PubMed ID: 11659272
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Sterilisation and the courts.
Grubb A; Pearl D
Camb Law J; 1987 Nov; 46(3):439-64. PubMed ID: 11659062
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Re Elizabeth (Ross, Jones J.).
Australia. Family Court
Fed Law Rep; 1989; 96():248-67. PubMed ID: 17001809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sterilization--where mentally retarded and presumably fertile daughter cannot understand or exercise her constitutional right to voluntary sterilization, equity court has jurisdiction to empower parents to exercise right on her behalf.
Fritschner SH
J Fam Law; 1980 Apr; 18(3):648-53. PubMed ID: 11658339
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Voluntary sterilization for persons with mental disabilities: the need for legislation.
Burnett BA
Syracuse Law Rev; 1981; 32(4):913-55. PubMed ID: 11658516
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Involuntary sterilization of the mentally retarded: blessing or burden?
Coleman SS
S D Law Rev; 1980; 25(1):55-68. PubMed ID: 11665097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. In re Jane, 22 December 1988.
Australia. Family Court
Annu Rev Popul Law; 1988; 15():21-2. PubMed ID: 12289416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Involuntary sexual sterilization of incompetents in Alabama: past, present, and future.
Larson EJ; Nelson LJ
Ala Law Rev; 1992; 43(2):399-444. PubMed ID: 11659705
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Sterilization of the mentally retarded minor: the Re K. case.
Finch-Noyes CA
Can J Fam Law; 1986; 5(1):277-99. PubMed ID: 11659190
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Balancing the right of the mentally retarded to obtain a therapeutic sterilization against the potential for abuse.
Irvine AC
Law Psychol Rev; 1988; 12():95-122. PubMed ID: 11660733
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Sterilization of mentally retarded persons: reproductive rights and family privacy.
Scott ES
Duke Law J; 1986 Nov; 1986(5):806-65. PubMed ID: 11658848
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Sterilisation and the mentally handicapped.
Cooney T
Dubl Univ Law J; 1989; 11(1):56-73. PubMed ID: 11659291
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Limitations on reproductive autonomy for the mentally handicapped.
Smith GP
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1988; 4():71-89. PubMed ID: 11645615
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Matter of Moe.
Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court, Worcester
North East Rep Second Ser; 1982 Mar; 432():712-24. PubMed ID: 12041253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The sterilization of women with an intellectual disability: a lawyer looks at the medical aspects.
Goldhar J
Univ Tasman Law Rev; 1991; 10(2):157-96. PubMed ID: 11659575
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
