273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12041109)
1. Rogers v. Commissioner of Department of Mental Health.
Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court, Suffolk
Mass Rep Mass Supreme Judic Court; 1983 Nov; 390():489-513. PubMed ID: 12041109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Rogers v. Okin.
U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Fed Report; 1984 Jun; 738():1-9. PubMed ID: 11648487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. United States v. Charters.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Fed Report; 1987 Sep; 829():479-500. PubMed ID: 11648561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Civil rights--a mental patient's right to refuse antipsychotic drugs: a constitutional right needing protection.
Lafferty M; Lawrence WJ; Lusvardi AA
Notre Dame Lawyer; 1981 Dec; 57(2):406-19. PubMed ID: 11658500
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The importance of establishing competence in cases involving the involuntary administration of psychotropic medications.
Knepper K
Law Psychol Rev; 1996; 20():97-137. PubMed ID: 11656625
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Constitutional law--an involuntarily committed mental patient has a qualified right to make treatment decisions absent a formal adjudication of incompetence--Rogers v. Commissioner of the Department of Mental Health.
White AB
Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1984; 18(3):503-11. PubMed ID: 11658616
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Medical decisionmaking for incompetent persons: the Massachusetts substituted judgment model.
Dunphy SM; Cross JH
West New Engl Law Rev; 1987; 9(1):153-67. PubMed ID: 11649910
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Involuntary commitment and the right to refuse treatment with anti-psychotic drugs.
Hahn WA
Creighton Law Rev; 1982-1983; 16(3):719-42. PubMed ID: 11658455
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Judicial schizophrenia: an involuntarily confined mental patient's right to refuse antipsychotic drugs.
Cort RS
UMKC Law Rev; 1982; 51(1):74-106. PubMed ID: 11658656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Rogers v. Okin.
U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Fed Report; 1980 Nov; 634():650-64. PubMed ID: 11648463
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Jarvis v. Levine.
Minnesota. Supreme Court
Wests North West Rep; 1988 Jan; 418():139-50. PubMed ID: 12041142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. State ex rel. Jones v. Gerhardstein.
Wisconsin. Supreme Court
Wests North West Rep; 1987 Dec; 416():883-900. PubMed ID: 12041140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. United States v. Leatherman.
U.S. District Court, District of Columbia
Fed Suppl; 1983 Oct; 580():977-81. PubMed ID: 11648498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Medicating committed psychiatric patients over their objections: balancing patients' interests and quality of mental health care.
Hacker G
Rutgers Law J; 1983; 14(3):685-739. PubMed ID: 11658759
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The right to refuse antipsychotic medications: law and policy.
Brooks AD
Rutgers Law Rev; 1987; 39(2-3):339-76. PubMed ID: 11659012
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. In re C.E.
Illinois. Supreme Court
Wests North East Rep; 1994 May; 641():345-60. PubMed ID: 12041179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. United States v. Charters.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Fed Report; 1988 Dec; 863():302-15. PubMed ID: 11648570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In re Jarvis.
Minnesota. Court of Appeals
Wests North West Rep; 1988 Dec; 433():120-4. PubMed ID: 12041143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Civil commitment in Wisconsin: the impact of Lessard v. Schmidt.
Zander TK
Wis L Rev; 1976; 1976(2):503-62. PubMed ID: 11664748
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Rethinking the right to refuse treatment.
Rachlin S
Psychiatr Ann; 1989 Apr; 19(4):213-22. PubMed ID: 11659202
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
