429 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12041120)
1. T.D. v. New York State Office of Mental Health.
New York. Supreme Court, New York County
N Y Suppl Second Ser; 1995 Feb; 626():1015-24. PubMed ID: 12041120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. T.D. v. New York State Office of Mental Health.
New York. Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department
N Y Suppl Second Ser; 1996 Dec; 650():173-94. PubMed ID: 12041119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. State law on human research did not protect subjects' rights: T.D. v. New York State Office of Mental Health (Part I).
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2000 Jan; 15(1):7-8. PubMed ID: 11658037
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Court says state agency avoided usual way of reporting problems with human subjects: T.D. v. New York State Office of Mental Health (Part II).
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2000 Feb; 15(2):7-8. PubMed ID: 11660763
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. State regulations on protecting mentally disabled research subjects are ruled invalid.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1999 Oct; 14(10):4-5. PubMed ID: 11658062
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Beyond Nuremberg: fifty years later, the debate continues on informed consent.
Barnes PG
ABA J; 1997 Mar; 83():24-7. PubMed ID: 11660466
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. New York State laws on protection of human subjects versus federal regulations: T.D. v. New York State Office of Mental Health (Part III).
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1999 Dec; 14(12):7-8. PubMed ID: 11660760
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Informed consent to organic behavior control.
Barnhart BA; Pinkerton ML; Roth RT
Santa Clara Law Rev; 1977; 17(1):39-83. PubMed ID: 11664710
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of a mentally ill individual's right to refuse medication under the United States and the New York State constitutions.
Brooks WM
Touro Law Rev; 1991; 8(1):1-54. PubMed ID: 11659527
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Civil rights--a mental patient's right to refuse antipsychotic drugs: a constitutional right needing protection.
Lafferty M; Lawrence WJ; Lusvardi AA
Notre Dame Lawyer; 1981 Dec; 57(2):406-19. PubMed ID: 11658500
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Judge tells Health Department to stop experiments on patients.
Hilts PJ
N Y Times Web; 1995 Mar; ():52. PubMed ID: 11648000
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Rogers v. Okin.
U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Fed Report; 1984 Jun; 738():1-9. PubMed ID: 11648487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rivers v. Katz.
New York. Court of Appeals
North East Rep Second Ser; 1986 Jun; 495():337-45. PubMed ID: 12041209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Uninformed decisionmaking. The case of surrogate research consent.
Haimowitz S; Delano SJ; Oldham JM
Hastings Cent Rep; 1997; 27(6):9-16. PubMed ID: 9474489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Psychosurgery and the involuntarily confined.
Kopesky JP
Villanova Law Rev; 1979 Sep; 24(5-6):949-91. PubMed ID: 11665098
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Woodland v. Angus.
U.S. District Court, D. Utah, C.D
Fed Suppl; 1993 Mar; 820():1497-519. PubMed ID: 11648607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Jarvis v. Levine.
Minnesota. Supreme Court
Wests North West Rep; 1988 Jan; 418():139-50. PubMed ID: 12041142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Court's role in decisionmaking involving incompetent refusals of life-sustaining care and psychiatric medications.
Parry JW
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1990; 14(6):468-76. PubMed ID: 11659325
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Jarvis v. Levine.
Minnesota. Court of Appeals
Wests North West Rep; 1987 Apr; 403():298-310. PubMed ID: 12041162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. United States Supreme Court and psychiatry: a critical look.
Malmquist CP
J Psychiatry Law; 1985; 13(1-2):137-64. PubMed ID: 11658821
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
