181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12041122)
1. State v. Olivas.
Washington. Supreme Court
Pac Rep Second Ser; 1993 Aug; 856():1076-94. PubMed ID: 12041122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Jones v. Murray.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Fed Report; 1992 Apr; 962():302-15. PubMed ID: 11648258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Allowing new technology to erode constitutional protections: a Fourth Amendment challenge to non-consensual DNA testing of prisoners.
Love SH
Villanova Law Rev; 1993; 38(5):1617-60. PubMed ID: 11653232
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Sanders v. Coman.
U.S. District Court, E.D. North Carolina, W.D.
Fed Suppl; 1994 Oct; 864():496-502. PubMed ID: 11648290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Criminal DNA data banks: revolution for law enforcement or threat to individual privacy?
Yee YH
Am J Crim Law; 1995; 22(2):461-90. PubMed ID: 11655161
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Genetic privacy: constitutional considerations in forensic DNA testing.
Burk DL; Hess JA
Geoge Mason Univ Civ Rights Law J; 1994; 5(1):1-53. PubMed ID: 11657430
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Can the government get into your genes?: A proposed New York statute for the use of genetic identification to establish probable cause.
Cavoli JG
Albany Law Rev; 1992; 55(4):1355-414. PubMed ID: 11652956
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. People v. Adams.
Illinois. Supreme Court
North East Rep Second Ser; 1992 Jul; 597():574-86. PubMed ID: 12041257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. DNA databanks giving police a powerful weapon, and critics.
Goldberg C
N Y Times Web; 1998 Feb; ():A1, A12. PubMed ID: 11647549
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The precarious implications of DNA profiling.
Smith JC
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1994; 55(3):865-88. PubMed ID: 11655079
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Mandatory HIV testing and prostitution: the world's oldest profession and the world's newest deadly disease.
Snell JG
Hastings Law J; 1994 Aug; 45(6):1565-92. PubMed ID: 11653305
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. F.B.I. set to open its DNA database for fighting crime: some fear for privacy.
Wade N
N Y Times Web; 1998 Oct; ():A1, A15. PubMed ID: 11647318
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. When rape victims' rights meet privacy rights: mandatory HIV testing, striking the fourth amendment balance.
Sadler BP
Wash Law Rev; 1992 Jan; 67(1):195-213. PubMed ID: 11652670
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Legislation would allow judges to order H.I.V. tests for suspects.
Levy CJ
N Y Times Web; 1996 Jan; ():B1, B2. PubMed ID: 11647099
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Privacy concerns regarding government use of genetic information.
Dash JF
J Biolaw Bus; 1999; 2(4):46-54. PubMed ID: 11658225
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The secrets of the genome revealed: threats to genetic privacy.
Doot GM
Wayne Law Rev; 1991; 37(3):1615-45. PubMed ID: 11659542
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Testing the hand that bites you: Johnetta J. v. the Municipal Court, mandatory AIDS testing, and the Fourth Amendment.
Whitcombe PT
North Ill Univ Law Rev; 1991; 11(2-3):445-79. PubMed ID: 11651510
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Florida's involuntary AIDS testing statutes.
Waters RC
Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1991; 19(2):369-405. PubMed ID: 11659553
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Murderers have rights too.
New Sci; 1998 May; 158(2135):3. PubMed ID: 11657473
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. DNA testing proposals.
N Y Times Web; 1998 Dec; ():A32. PubMed ID: 11647657
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
