These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12041125)
1. People in Interest of S.P.B. Colorado. Supreme Court Pac Rep Second Ser; 1982 Oct; 651():1213-8. PubMed ID: 12041125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Doe v. Smith. U.S. Supreme Court Wests Supreme Court Report; 1988 Jun; 108():2136-8. PubMed ID: 12041288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Paternal interests in the abortion decision: does the father have a say? Diggins M Univ Chic Leg Forum; 1989; 1989():377-97. PubMed ID: 11656041 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth. 31 Jan 1975. U.S. District Court, E.D. Missouri, E.D Fed Suppl; 1975; 392():1362-79. PubMed ID: 11646047 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A man's right to be equal: the abortion issue. Shalev C Isr Law Rev; 1983; 18(3-4):381-430. PubMed ID: 11659119 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Abortion: the father's rights. Gilbert RA Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1973; 42(3):441-67. PubMed ID: 11664234 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Tremblay v. Daigle. Canada. Supreme Court Dom Law Rep; 1989 Aug; 62():634-65. PubMed ID: 12041082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. C v. S. Great Britain. Court of Appeal, Civil Division (23, 24, 25 Feb 1987) [and] Queen's Bench Division (17, 18, 20, 21, 23 Feb 1987) All Engl Law Rep; 1987 Feb 23-25 (date of decision); [1987] 1():1230-44. PubMed ID: 11648562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Poe v. Gerstein. 18 Aug 1975. U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit Fed Report; 1975; 517():787-97. PubMed ID: 11646046 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Canada's Supreme Court rejects ex-lover's effort to halt abortion. Barron J N Y Times Web; 1989 Aug; ():A1, A3. PubMed ID: 11647413 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Sex as contract: abortion and expanded choice. Feaver PD; Kling R; Plofchan TK Stanford Law Pol Rev; 1992-1993 Winter; 4():211-20. PubMed ID: 11652652 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Jones v. Smith. U.S. District Court, S.D. Florida Fed Suppl; 1979 Jul; 474():1160-72. PubMed ID: 11648523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Constitutional law--abortion--parental and spousal consent requirements violate right to privacy in abortion decision. Sanders JE Univ Kans Law Rev; 1976; 24(2):446-62. PubMed ID: 11664628 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Abortion and the consideration of fundamental, irreconcilable interests. Jones CJ Syracuse Law Rev; 1982; 33(2):565-613. PubMed ID: 11658668 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Protecting the life of the unborn child. Grubb A; Pearl D Law Q Rev; 1987 Jul; 103():340-6. PubMed ID: 11658992 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Using the courts to stop abortion by injunction: Mock v. Brandanburg. Martin SL Can J Women Law; 1989-1990; 3(2):569-83. PubMed ID: 11659311 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Conn v. Conn. Indiana. Court of Appeals, First District Wests North East Rep; 1988 Jul; 525():612-6. PubMed ID: 12041181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The husband's rights in abortion. Etzioni A Trial; 1976 Nov; 12(11):56-8. PubMed ID: 11664680 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Coleman v. Coleman. Maryland. Court of Special Appeals Atl Report; 1984 Mar; 471():1115-21. PubMed ID: 11648494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]