These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12041132)

  • 1. Syrkowski v. Appleyard.
    Michigan. Supreme Court
    Wests North West Rep; 1985 Jan; 362():211-4. PubMed ID: 12041132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A medical advancement in search of a legal theory--artificial insemination by donor and the law.
    Baylson MM
    Semin Reprod Endocrinol; 1987 Feb; 5(1):69-80. PubMed ID: 11658912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Surrogate motherhood: the interaction of litigation, legislation and psychiatry.
    Parker PJ
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1982; 5(3-4):341-54. PubMed ID: 11649740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In re Adoption of Matthew B.-M.
    California. Court of Appeal, First District, Division 3
    Wests Calif Report; 1991 Jul; 284():18-38. PubMed ID: 11648597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Doe v. Attorney General.
    Michigan. Court of Appeals
    Wests North West Rep; 1992 Jun; 487():484-90. PubMed ID: 12041159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Artificial insemination and the law.
    Jensen BJ
    Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1982; 1982(4):935-90. PubMed ID: 11658495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Whose child is it anyway?
    Platt EF
    Med Leg J; 1994; 62 ( Pt 4)():180-97. PubMed ID: 7845312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. R.R. v. M.H.
    Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court, Worcester
    North East Rep Second Ser; 1998 Jan; 689():790-7. PubMed ID: 12041242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Conceiving for cash; is it legal?: a survey of the laws applicable to surrogate motherhood.
    Taylor S
    N Y Law School Hum Rights Annu; 1987; 4(Part 2):413-44. PubMed ID: 11650203
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The baby broker boom.
    Annas GJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Jun; 16(3):30-1. PubMed ID: 3721847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Alternative means of reproduction: virgin territory for legislation.
    Lorio KV
    LA Law Rev; 1984 Jul; 44(6):1641-76. PubMed ID: 11658743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Doe v. Attorney General.
    Michigan. Court of Appeals
    Mich Appeals Rep Mich Court Appeals; 1981 May; 106():169-74. PubMed ID: 12041107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Model human reproduction technologies and surrogacy act.
    Abbas J
    Iowa Law Rev; 1987 May; 72(4):943-1013. PubMed ID: 11659499
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The judicial aspects of artificial insemination.
    Strasberg-Cohen T
    Med Law; 1982 Jun; 1(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 11649658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Austria: a legal ban on surrogate mothers and fathers?
    Bernat E; Straka U
    J Fam Law; 1992-1993 Spring; 31(2):267-82. PubMed ID: 11660068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts v. Attorney General.
    Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court
    North East Rep Second Ser; 1997 Mar; 677():101-14. PubMed ID: 12041240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surrogate motherhood and the baby-selling laws.
    Katz A
    Columbia J Law Soc Probl; 1986; 20(1):1-53. PubMed ID: 11658800
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Artificial insemination by donor: information, communication and regulation.
    Gibson EL
    J Fam Law; 1991-1992; 30(1):1-44. PubMed ID: 11659440
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Uniform Status of Children of Assisted Conception Act.
    ;
    Fam Law Rep (Wash D C); 1989 Feb; 15(16):2009-16. PubMed ID: 11659181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
    Fed Report; 1991 Oct; 947():682-727. PubMed ID: 11648596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.