These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12041145)
1. In re Conservatorship of Torres. Minnesota. Supreme Court Wests North West Rep; 1984 Nov; 357():332-41. PubMed ID: 12041145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In re Drabick. California. Court of Appeal, Sixth District Wests Calif Report; 1988 Apr; 245():840-61. PubMed ID: 11648267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Conservatorship of Morrison. California. Court of Appeal, First District, Division 5 Wests Calif Report; 1988 Nov; 253():530-5. PubMed ID: 11648269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In re Estate of Longeway. Illinois. Supreme Court North East Rep Second Ser; 1989 Nov; 549():292-322. PubMed ID: 12041217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In re L.H.R. Georgia. Supreme Court South East Report Second Ser; 1984 Oct; 321():716-23. PubMed ID: 12041318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In re Gardner. Maine. Supreme Judicial Court Atl Report; 1987 Dec; 534():947-59. PubMed ID: 11648266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In the Matter of the Conservatorship of Rudolfo Torres Conservatee. Paulus SM Issues Law Med; 1985 Nov; 1(3):237-41. PubMed ID: 11644499 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Someone make up my mind: the troubling right to die issues presented by incompetent patients with no prior expression of a treatment preference. Richard SM Notre Dame Law Rev; 1989; 64(3):394-421. PubMed ID: 11659243 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The Nancy Cruzan case. McCormick RA Midwest Med Ethics; 1989; 5(1-2):2-31. PubMed ID: 12091960 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Refusal of life-sustaining treatment for terminally ill incompetent patients: court orders and an alternative. Rubin BL Columbia J Law Soc Probl; 1985; 19(1):19-68. PubMed ID: 11658755 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Whose right is it anyway? Individualism, community, and the right to die: a commentary on the New Jersey experience. Weinberg JK Hastings Law J; 1988 Nov; 40(1):119-67. PubMed ID: 11659106 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Coming to terms with death: the Cruzan case. Martyn SR; Bourguignon HJ Hastings Law J; 1991 Mar; 42(3):817-58. PubMed ID: 11652588 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Estate of Leach v. Shapiro. Ohio. Court of Appeals, Summit County North East Rep Second Ser; 1984 May; 469():1047-55. PubMed ID: 12041215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In re Guardianship of L.W. Wisconsin. Supreme Court Wests North West Rep; 1992 Apr; 482():60-79. PubMed ID: 12041147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Withdrawal and withholding of life-support in terminally ill patients. Part I. Solnick PB Med Law; 1984 Sep; 3(4):303-32. PubMed ID: 11651779 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Therefore, choose death. Brown ML Human Rights; 1982; 10(3):38-45. PubMed ID: 11651709 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Constitutional development of judicial criteria in right-to-die cases: from brain dead to persistent vegetative state. Morgan R; Harty-Golder B Wake Forest Law Rev; 1988; 23(4):721-65. PubMed ID: 11652556 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. In re Conroy. New Jersey. Superior Court, Chancery Division, Essex County Atl Report; 1983 Feb; 457():1232-7. PubMed ID: 11648154 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. From Quinlan to Cruzan: patterns in the fabric of US "right-to-die" case law. Allsopp ME Humane Med; 1992 Apr; 8(2):122-31. PubMed ID: 11651322 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]