171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12041154)
21. Committee to Defend Reproductive Rights v. Myers: Medi-Cal funding of abortion.
Hendrickson E
Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 1978; 9(2):361-419. PubMed ID: 11664072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Bell v. Low Income Women of Texas.
Texas. Supreme Court
Wests South West Report; 2002; 95():253-66. PubMed ID: 16479705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Legal aspects of abortion practice.
Goldman EB
Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1986 Mar; 13(1):135-43. PubMed ID: 3709009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Women of the State of Minnesota v. Gomez.
Minnesota. Supreme Court
North West Rep Second Ser; 1995 Dec; 542():17-42. PubMed ID: 12041173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Fischer v. Department of Public Welfare.
Pennsylvania. Supreme Court
Atl Report; 1985 Dec; 502():114-26. PubMed ID: 11648358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Federal court rules on Hyde Amendment in Michigan case.
Reprod Freedom News; 1994 Jul; 3(14):2. PubMed ID: 12287944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The Supreme Court on abortion funding: the second time around.
Horan DJ; Marzen TJ
St Louis Univ Law J; 1981; 25(2):411-27. PubMed ID: 11655812
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Illinois v. United States Department of Health and Human Services.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Fed Report; 1985 Aug; 772():329-35. PubMed ID: 11648364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The racially disparate impact of restrictions on the public funding of abortion: an analysis of current equal protection doctrine.
Baron DR
Boston Coll Third World Law J; 1993; 13(1):1-61. PubMed ID: 11656354
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Williams v. Zbaraz. 30 Jun 1980.
U.S. Supreme Court
U S Rep U S Supreme Court; 1980; 448():358-70. PubMed ID: 12038370
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Right to Choose v. Byrne.
New Jersey. Supreme Court
Atl Report; 1982 Aug; 450():925-51. PubMed ID: 11648363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Constitutional law--United States Supreme Court upholds the constitutionality of the Hyde Amendment...--Harris v. McRae, 100 S.Ct. 2671 (1980).
Barnett BA
Temple Law Q; 1981; 54(1):109-44. PubMed ID: 11655628
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The right to Medicaid payment for abortion.
Butler PA
Hastings Law J; 1977 Mar; 28(4):931-77. PubMed ID: 11663756
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Elizabeth Blackwell Health Center for Women v. Knoll.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Fed Report; 1995 Jul; 61():170-97. PubMed ID: 11648419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Public funding of medically necessary abortions is not required under the Medicaid Act: Harris v. McRae, 100 S.Ct. 2671 (1980).
Gray AD
Tex Tech Law Rev; 1981; 12(2):483-99. PubMed ID: 11655635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. State of Georgia, Dept. of Medical Assistance v. Heckler.
U.S. District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division
Fed Suppl; 1984 Apr; 583():1377-82. PubMed ID: 11648336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The abortion-funding issue: a study in mixed constitutional cues.
Yarbrough TE
North Carol Law Rev; 1981 Mar; 59(3):611-27. PubMed ID: 11655747
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Abortion on demand in a post-Wade context: must the state pay the bills?
Fordham Law Rev; 1973; 41(4):921-44. PubMed ID: 11661025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Colorado rejects regulations to limit Medicaid coverage for abortion.
Reprod Freedom News; 1994 May; 3(10):5-6. PubMed ID: 12319329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Abortion--State Budget Act restricting circumstances under which public funds would be authorized to pay for abortions for Medi-Cal recipients held unconstitutional--Committee to Defend Reproductive Rights v. Myers, 29 Cal. 3d 252, 625 P. 2d 779, 172 Cal. Rptr. 866 (1981).
Harris DJ
J Fam Law; 1981-1982; 20(2):345-51. PubMed ID: 11655656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
