These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12041156)

  • 1. State v. Andring.
    Minnesota. Supreme Court
    Wests North West Rep; 1984 Jan; 342():128-35. PubMed ID: 12041156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Medical and psychotherapy privileges and confidentiality: on giving with one hand and removing with the other.
    Smith SR
    KY Law J; 1986-1987; 75(3):473-557. PubMed ID: 11651896
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence law--the psychotherapist-patient privilege in federal courts.
    Cerveny K; Kent MJ
    Notre Dame Law Rev; 1984; 59(3):791-816. PubMed ID: 11658789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Confidential communications of psychotherapists.
    DeKraai MB; Sales BD
    Psychotherapy (Chic); 1984; 21(3):293-318. PubMed ID: 11649733
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Confidential communications between physician and patient in judicial and administrative proceedings.
    Aranoff M; Hirsh HL
    Med Trial Tech Q; 1983; 29(3):331-52. PubMed ID: 11655612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Psychotherapy and privileged communications in child custody cases.
    Knapp SJ; Vandecreek L
    Prof Psychol Res Pr; 1985 Jun; 16(3):398-407. PubMed ID: 11650745
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Case underlines psychiatric issue: to keep confidences or report threats.
    Marcus FF
    N Y Times Web; 1986 May; ():A10. PubMed ID: 11646505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The psychotherapist-patient privilege in Washington: extending the privilege to community mental health clinics.
    Hague WW
    Wash Law Rev; 1983 Jul; 58(3):565-86. PubMed ID: 11658506
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Privileged communications of psychologists.
    DeKraai MB; Sales BD
    Prof Psychol; 1982 Jun; 13(3):372-88. PubMed ID: 11653564
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patient confidentiality and the criminal justice system: a critical examination of the new federal confidentiality regulations.
    Weissman JC; Berns BR
    Contemp Drug Probl; 1976; 5(4):531-52. PubMed ID: 11661456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pregnant substance abusers: a problem that won't go away.
    Swenson VJ; Crabbe C
    St Marys Law J; 1994; 25(2):623-73. PubMed ID: 11652732
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The psychiatric duty to warn: walking a tightrope of uncertainty.
    McClarren GM
    Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1987; 56(1):269-93. PubMed ID: 11658955
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. State v. McKown.
    Minnesota. Supreme Court
    Wests North West Rep; 1991 Sep; 475():63-71. PubMed ID: 12041164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Confidentiality of alcohol and drug abuse patient records. Proposed rules.
    U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare; U.S. Special Action Office for Drug Abuse Prevention
    Fed Regist; 1974 Aug; 39(164):30426-37. PubMed ID: 11663643
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The psychotherapist-client testimonial privilege: defining the professional involved.
    Dubbelday CJ
    Emory Law J; 1985; 34(3-4):777-826. PubMed ID: 11658791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Colyar v. Third Judicial District Court for Salt Lake County.
    U.S. District Court, D. Utah, C.D
    Fed Suppl; 1979 Feb; 469():424-37. PubMed ID: 11648452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Treating children under the New Mexico mental health and developmental disabilities code.
    Ellis JW; Carter DK
    N M Law Rev; 1980; 10(2):279-309. PubMed ID: 11665249
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Conflict of interest between therapist-patient confidentiality and the duty to report sexual abuse of children.
    Miller RD; Weinstock R
    Behav Sci Law; 1987; 5(2):161-74. PubMed ID: 11650774
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rogers v. Okin.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
    Fed Report; 1984 Jun; 738():1-9. PubMed ID: 11648487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Laetrile: may the state intervene on behalf of a minor?
    Ainsworth MV; Wall T
    Univ Kans Law Rev; 1982; 30(3):409-28. PubMed ID: 12083079
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.