These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12041159)

  • 21. The case for enforcement of the surrogate contract.
    Hill JL
    Politics Life Sci; 1990 Feb; 8(2):147-60. PubMed ID: 11650306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Contracts to bear a child: the mixed legislative signals.
    Wadlington WJ
    Ida Law Rev; 1992-1993; 29(2):383-410. PubMed ID: 11652308
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Surrogacy legislation in California: proposals and commentary.
    Davis AD
    Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1994; 28(3):571-92. PubMed ID: 11655175
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. In re Baby M.
    New Jersey. Supreme Court
    Atl Report; 1988 Feb; 537():1227-73. PubMed ID: 11648559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. In defense of surrogate parenting: a critical analysis of the recent Kentucky experience.
    Phillips JW; Phillips SD
    KY Law J; 1980-1981; 69(4):877-931. PubMed ID: 11658606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Providing protection for collaborative noncoital reproduction: surrogate motherhood and other new procreative technologies, and the right of intimate association.
    Ikemoto LC
    Rutgers Law Rev; 1988; 40(4):1273-309. PubMed ID: 11650138
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Within the best interests of the child: the factor of parental status in custody disputes arising from surrogacy contracts.
    Russell IS
    J Fam Law; 1988-1989; 27(3):585-671. PubMed ID: 11650247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Legal problems of surrogate motherhood.
    Black RC
    New Engl Law Rev; 1980-1981; 16(3):373-95. PubMed ID: 11649691
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Surrogate motherhood: the interaction of litigation, legislation and psychiatry.
    Parker PJ
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1982; 5(3-4):341-54. PubMed ID: 11649740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The baby broker boom.
    Annas GJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Jun; 16(3):30-1. PubMed ID: 3721847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Brokers downplay surrogacy ruling.
    Hanley R
    N Y Times Web; 1988 Feb; ():B5. PubMed ID: 11646650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. In re Baby M.
    New Jersey. Superior Court, Chancery Division, Family Part, Bergen County
    Atl Report; 1987 Mar; 525():1128-76. PubMed ID: 11648146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Sexuality, privacy and the new biology.
    Smith GP; Iraola R
    Marquette Law Rev; 1984; 67(2):263-91. PubMed ID: 11658703
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Surrogate motherhood and the baby-selling laws.
    Katz A
    Columbia J Law Soc Probl; 1986; 20(1):1-53. PubMed ID: 11658800
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. From the individual to the dividual: in the supermarket of "reproductive alternatives.
    Mies M
    Reprod Genet Eng; 1988; 1(3):225-37. PubMed ID: 11650396
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Conceiving for cash; is it legal?: a survey of the laws applicable to surrogate motherhood.
    Taylor S
    N Y Law School Hum Rights Annu; 1987; 4(Part 2):413-44. PubMed ID: 11650203
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A case against pregnancy contracts: embodied selves, liberal theory and the law.
    Shanley ML
    Politics Life Sci; 1990 Feb; 8(2):216-20. PubMed ID: 11650314
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Alternative birth technologies: legal challenges.
    Capron AM
    Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1987; 20(4):679-704. PubMed ID: 11659041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The surrogate mother contract in Indiana.
    Dodd BJ
    Indiana Law Rev; 1982; 15(4):807-30. PubMed ID: 11649581
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Anna J. v. Mark C.: proof of the imminent need for surrogate motherhood regulation.
    Smith BP
    J Fam Law; 1991-1992; 30(2):493-517. PubMed ID: 11659536
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.