These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12041159)
41. Baby M reconsidered. Areen J Georgetown Law J; 1988 Jun; 76(5):1741-58. PubMed ID: 11649249 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Explorations in the law of surrogacy. Kopytoff B Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1994; 28(3):593-602. PubMed ID: 11655176 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Act No. 199, 27 June 1988. United States. Michigan Annu Rev Popul Law; 1988; 15():60, 386-7. PubMed ID: 12289631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Michigan's struggle with assisted suicide and related issues as illuminated by current case law: an overview of People v. Kevorkian. Branigan JM Univ Detroit Mercy Law Rev; 1995; 72(4):959-87. PubMed ID: 11654376 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Surrogacy not illegal in Israel. Fishman RH Lancet; 1996 Jan; 347(8994):113. PubMed ID: 11654254 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Matter of Baby M., 3 February 1988. United States. New Jersey. Supreme Court Annu Rev Popul Law; 1988; 15():61. PubMed ID: 12289633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Surrogate motherhood and the marketplace. May WF Second Opin; 1988 Nov; 9():132-40. PubMed ID: 11650105 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Surrogacy arrangements and the conflict of laws. Appleton SF Wis L Rev; 1990; 1990(2):399-482. PubMed ID: 11652060 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Regulating confidentiality of surrogacy records: lessons from the adoption experience. Smith P J Fam Law; 1992-1993 Winter; 31(1):65-103. PubMed ID: 11656450 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Legal aspects of artificial human reproduction: can the law afford to play ostrich? Clapshaw D Auckl Univ Law Rev; 1982 Jun; 4(3):254-72. PubMed ID: 11658651 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Model human reproduction technologies and surrogacy act. Abbas J Iowa Law Rev; 1987 May; 72(4):943-1013. PubMed ID: 11659499 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. The itinerant embryo and the neo-nativity scene: bifurcating biological maternity. O'Brien S Utah Law Rev; 1987; 1987-1(1):1-33. PubMed ID: 11658919 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Alternative means of reproduction: virgin territory for legislation. Lorio KV LA Law Rev; 1984 Jul; 44(6):1641-76. PubMed ID: 11658743 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Stiver v. Parker. U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit Fed Report; 1992 Sep; 975():261-75. PubMed ID: 11648601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Perspectives on surrogate motherhood. Little MO Med Humanit Rev; 1995; 9(2):38-45. PubMed ID: 11653303 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Doe v. Maher. Connecticut. Superior Court, Judicial District of New Haven Atl Report; 1986 Apr; 515():134-62. PubMed ID: 11648371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. In the matter of Baby M: rejudged. Raymond JG Reprod Genet Eng; 1988; 1(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 11650375 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Artificial insemination and the law. Jensen BJ Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1982; 1982(4):935-90. PubMed ID: 11658495 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Privacy, surrogacy, and the Baby M case. Allen AL Georgetown Law J; 1988 Jun; 76(5):1759-92. PubMed ID: 11649250 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. The rights of the biological father: from adoption and custody to surrogate motherhood. Stanton ER Vt Law Rev; 1987; 12(1):87-121. PubMed ID: 11658956 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]