These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12041163)

  • 1. In re Schmidt.
    Minnesota. Supreme Court
    Wests North West Rep; 1989 Jul; 443():824-30. PubMed ID: 12041163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Involuntary commitment and the right to refuse treatment with anti-psychotic drugs.
    Hahn WA
    Creighton Law Rev; 1982-1983; 16(3):719-42. PubMed ID: 11658455
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rogers v. Okin.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
    Fed Report; 1984 Jun; 738():1-9. PubMed ID: 11648487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Civil rights--a mental patient's right to refuse antipsychotic drugs: a constitutional right needing protection.
    Lafferty M; Lawrence WJ; Lusvardi AA
    Notre Dame Lawyer; 1981 Dec; 57(2):406-19. PubMed ID: 11658500
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stensvad v. Reivitz.
    U.S. District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
    Fed Suppl; 1985 Jan; 601():128-32. PubMed ID: 11648509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Medicating committed psychiatric patients over their objections: balancing patients' interests and quality of mental health care.
    Hacker G
    Rutgers Law J; 1983; 14(3):685-739. PubMed ID: 11658759
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The right to refuse treatment: Commonwealth developments and issues.
    Gordon R; Verdun-Jones SN
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1983; 6():57-73. PubMed ID: 11658523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Jarvis v. Levine.
    Minnesota. Court of Appeals
    Wests North West Rep; 1987 Apr; 403():298-310. PubMed ID: 12041162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In re Jarvis.
    Minnesota. Court of Appeals
    Wests North West Rep; 1988 Dec; 433():120-4. PubMed ID: 12041143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Jarvis v. Levine.
    Minnesota. Supreme Court
    Wests North West Rep; 1988 Jan; 418():139-50. PubMed ID: 12041142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In re Desmond.
    Minnesota. Court of Appeals
    Wests North West Rep; 1986 Feb; 381():57-60. PubMed ID: 12041168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Children's competence to provide informed consent for mental health treatment.
    Redding RE
    Wash Lee Law Rev; 1993; 50(2):695-753. PubMed ID: 11656328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Making kids take their medicine: the privacy and due process rights of de facto competent minors.
    Costello JC
    Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1998 Apr; 31(3):907-27. PubMed ID: 11660787
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Keyhea v. Rushen.
    California. Court of Appeal, First District, Division 5
    Wests Calif Report; 1986 Mar; 223():746-55. PubMed ID: 11648546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The right to refuse treatment in New Jersey.
    Perlin ML
    Psychiatr Ann; 1976 Jun; 6(6):90-92+. PubMed ID: 11662299
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Judicial schizophrenia: an involuntarily confined mental patient's right to refuse antipsychotic drugs.
    Cort RS
    UMKC Law Rev; 1982; 51(1):74-106. PubMed ID: 11658656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In re C.E.
    Illinois. Supreme Court
    Wests North East Rep; 1994 May; 641():345-60. PubMed ID: 12041179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In re Guardianship of Ruth E.J.
    Wisconsin. Court of Appeals
    North West Rep Second Ser; 1995 Sep; 540():213-7. PubMed ID: 12041176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rights within the therapeutic relationship.
    King P
    J Law Health; 1991-1992; 6(1):31-60. PubMed ID: 11659514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Compelling treatment in the community: distorted doctrines and violated values.
    Schwartz SJ; Costanzo CE
    Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1987 Jun; 20(4):1329-429. PubMed ID: 11658983
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.