128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12041171)
1. In re Martin.
Michigan. Supreme Court
North West Rep Second Ser; 1995 Aug; 538():399-420. PubMed ID: 12041171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In re Martin.
Michigan. Court of Appeals
Wests North West Rep; 1993 Jul; 504():917-28. PubMed ID: 12041148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. "Mary, Mary, quite contrary, how was I to know?" Michael Martin, absolute prescience, and the right to die in Michigan.
Broder AJ; Cranford RE
Univ Detroit Mercy Law Rev; 1995; 72(4):787-832. PubMed ID: 11654371
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Will the real Michael Martin please speak up! Medical decisionmaking for questionably competent persons.
Marzen TJ; Avila D
Univ Detroit Mercy Law Rev; 1995; 72(4):833-71. PubMed ID: 11654372
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Bitter fight to Supreme Court over the life of a man who can only smile.
Lewin T
N Y Times Web; 1996 Feb; ():A8. PubMed ID: 11647133
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Mack v. Mack.
Maryland. Court of Appeals
Atl Report; 1993 Feb; 618():744-76. PubMed ID: 11648279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In re Visbeck.
New Jersey. Superior Court, Chancery Division, Morris County
Atl Report; 1986 Feb; 510():125-33. PubMed ID: 11648551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In re Clark.
New Jersey. Superior Court, Chancery Division, Camden County
Atl Report; 1986 Apr; 510():136-46. PubMed ID: 11648172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In re Drabick.
California. Court of Appeal, Sixth District
Wests Calif Report; 1988 Apr; 245():840-61. PubMed ID: 11648267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cruzan II: a clear and convincing travesty.
Bopp J; Avila D
Natl Univ Law Rev; 1992 Apr; 1(1):1-47. PubMed ID: 11654704
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. In re Gordy.
Delaware. Court of Chancery, New Castle County
Atl Report; 1994 Dec; 658():613-9. PubMed ID: 11648291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In re Conroy.
New Jersey. Superior Court, Chancery Division, Essex County
Atl Report; 1983 Feb; 457():1232-7. PubMed ID: 11648154
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Decisionmaking in authorizing and withholding life sustaining medical treatment: from Quinlan to Cruzan.
Keilitz I; Bilzor JC; Hafemeister TL; Brown V; Dudyshyn D
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1989; 13(5):482-93. PubMed ID: 11654759
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. In re Guardianship of L.W.
Wisconsin. Supreme Court
Wests North West Rep; 1992 Apr; 482():60-79. PubMed ID: 12041147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In re Estate of Longeway.
Illinois. Supreme Court
North East Rep Second Ser; 1989 Nov; 549():292-322. PubMed ID: 12041217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Matter of Conroy.
New Jersey. Supreme Court
Atl Report; 1985 Jan; 486():1209-50. PubMed ID: 11648233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health.
U.S. Supreme Court
Wests Supreme Court Report; 1990 Jun; 110():2841-92. PubMed ID: 12041283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In re Gardner.
Maine. Supreme Judicial Court
Atl Report; 1987 Dec; 534():947-59. PubMed ID: 11648266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In re Peter.
New Jersey. Supreme Court
Atl Report; 1987 Jun; 529():419-34. PubMed ID: 11648264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Withdrawal of life support: conflict among patient wishes, family, physicians, courts and statutes, and the law.
Tarantino LM
Buffalo Law Rev; 1994; 42(2):623-52. PubMed ID: 11652996
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
