These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12041179)
1. In re C.E. Illinois. Supreme Court Wests North East Rep; 1994 May; 641():345-60. PubMed ID: 12041179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The importance of establishing competence in cases involving the involuntary administration of psychotropic medications. Knepper K Law Psychol Rev; 1996; 20():97-137. PubMed ID: 11656625 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Hightower v. Olmstead. U.S. District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division Fed Suppl; 1996 Sep; 959():1549-73. PubMed ID: 11648628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In re Mental Commitment of M.P. Indiana. Court of Appeals, Second District North East Rep Second Ser; 1986 Nov; 500():216-28. PubMed ID: 12041210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. State ex rel. Jones v. Gerhardstein. Wisconsin. Supreme Court Wests North West Rep; 1987 Dec; 416():883-900. PubMed ID: 12041140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Compelling treatment in the community: distorted doctrines and violated values. Schwartz SJ; Costanzo CE Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1987 Jun; 20(4):1329-429. PubMed ID: 11658983 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. In re Schmidt. Minnesota. Supreme Court Wests North West Rep; 1989 Jul; 443():824-30. PubMed ID: 12041163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Washington v. Harper. U.S. Supreme Court Wests Supreme Court Report; 1990 Feb; 110():1028-56. PubMed ID: 12041281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Of the parens patriae commitment power and drug treatment of schizophrenia: do the benefits to the patient justify involuntary treatment? DuBose EZ Minn Law Rev; 1976 Jun; 60(6):1149-218. PubMed ID: 11664731 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Rogers v. Commissioner of Department of Mental Health. Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court, Suffolk Mass Rep Mass Supreme Judic Court; 1983 Nov; 390():489-513. PubMed ID: 12041109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The administration of psychotropic drugs to prisoners: state of the law and beyond. Floyd J Calif Law Rev; 1990 Oct; 78(5):1243-85. PubMed ID: 11659407 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. In re Jarvis. Minnesota. Court of Appeals Wests North West Rep; 1988 Dec; 433():120-4. PubMed ID: 12041143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In re Orr. Illinois. Appellate Court, Fourth District North East Rep Second Ser; 1988 Nov; 531():64-75. PubMed ID: 12041254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Involuntary commitment and the right to refuse treatment with anti-psychotic drugs. Hahn WA Creighton Law Rev; 1982-1983; 16(3):719-42. PubMed ID: 11658455 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Stensvad v. Reivitz. U.S. District Court, W.D. Wisconsin Fed Suppl; 1985 Jan; 601():128-32. PubMed ID: 11648509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reevaluating substantive due process as a source of protection for psychiatric patients to refuse drugs. Brooks WM Indiana Law Rev; 1998; 31(4):937-1017. PubMed ID: 15386905 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of a mentally ill individual's right to refuse medication under the United States and the New York State constitutions. Brooks WM Touro Law Rev; 1991; 8(1):1-54. PubMed ID: 11659527 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Opinion of the Justices. New Hampshire. Supreme Court Atl Report; 1983 Aug; 465():484-91. PubMed ID: 11648508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rogers v. Okin. U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit Fed Report; 1984 Jun; 738():1-9. PubMed ID: 11648487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Project Release v. Prevost. U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit Fed Report; 1983 Oct; 722():960-81. PubMed ID: 11648484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]