These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12041182)

  • 1. Preterm Cleveland v. Voinovich.
    Ohio. Court of Appeals, Franklin County
    Wests North East Rep; 1993 Jul; 627():570-92. PubMed ID: 12041182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
    Fed Report; 1991 Oct; 947():682-727. PubMed ID: 11648596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Wests Supreme Court Report; 1992 Jun; 112():2791-885. PubMed ID: 12041291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey: the reaffirmation of Roe or the beginning of the end?
    Henry KS
    Univ Louisv J Fam Law; 1993-1994 Winter; 32(1):93-113. PubMed ID: 11660011
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reading Casey: structuring the woman's decisionmaking process.
    Goldstein RD
    William Mary Bill Rights J; 1996; 4(3):787-880. PubMed ID: 11660789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the current state of abortion law.
    Berlin SI
    Second Opin; 1993 Jan; 18(3):104-9. PubMed ID: 11645221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Jane L. v. Bangerter.
    U.S. District Court, D. Utah, C.D
    Fed Suppl; 1992 Dec; 809():865-80. PubMed ID: 11648409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Jane L. v. Bangerter.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
    Fed Report; 1995 Aug; 61():1493-505. PubMed ID: 11648625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dworkin and Casey on abortion.
    Stroud S
    Philos Public Aff; 1996; 25(2):140-70. PubMed ID: 11660187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sojourner T v. Edwards.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
    Fed Report; 1992 Sep; 974():27-32. PubMed ID: 11648404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
    U.S. District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
    Fed Suppl; 1993 May; 822():227-39. PubMed ID: 11648410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Abortion compromise -- inevitable and impossible.
    Law SA
    Univ Ill Law Rev; 1992; 25(4):921-41. PubMed ID: 11656296
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A decade of cementing the mosaic of Roe v. Wade: is the composite a message to leave abortion alone?
    Kudner KE
    Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1984; 15(2):681-753. PubMed ID: 11649780
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Workability of the undue burden test.
    Schneider EA
    Temple Law Rev; 1993; 66(3):1003-37. PubMed ID: 11659882
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Guam Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists v. Ada.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
    Fed Report; 1992 Jun; 962():1366-74. PubMed ID: 11648405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A divisive issue and a divided court: Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
    Campbell A
    Oxf J Leg Stud; 1993; 13(4):571-83. PubMed ID: 11656374
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How rights are infringed: the role of undue burden analysis in constitutional doctrine.
    Brownstein A
    Hastings Law J; 1994 Apr; 45(4):867-959. PubMed ID: 11656422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Supreme Court, the "facts of life" and "the thoughtful part of the nation.
    Destro RA
    Hum Life Rev; 1994; 20(3):28-48. PubMed ID: 11656359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the death of repose in reproductive decisionmaking.
    Nivala J
    Const Law J; 1993; 4(1):47-95. PubMed ID: 12083095
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Justices uphold abortion rights by narrow vote.
    Taylor S
    N Y Times Web; 1986 Jun; ():A1, B10-11. PubMed ID: 11647367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.