These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12041182)

  • 21. Court gets stark arguments on abortion.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1992 Apr; ():A1, B10-11. PubMed ID: 11646254
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Beyond Roe, after Casey: the present and future of a "fundamental" right.
    Benshoof J
    Womens Health Issues; 1993; 3(3):162-70. PubMed ID: 8274872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Casey, Bray and beyond: religious liberty and the abortion debate.
    Simmons PD
    St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1993; 13(1):467-88. PubMed ID: 11656618
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Barnes v. Moore.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
    Fed Report; 1992 Aug; 970():12-6. PubMed ID: 11648402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The road not taken: state constitutions as an alternative source of protection for reproductive rights.
    O'Neill KF
    N Y Law School Hum Rights Annu; 1993; 11(Part 1):1-77. PubMed ID: 11656430
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the flight from reason in the Supreme Court.
    Linton PB
    St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1993; 13(1):15-137. PubMed ID: 11656611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The erosion of Roe v. Wade; do minors have any rights?
    Sourial WH
    Whittier Law Rev; 1992; 13(1):285-332. PubMed ID: 11656215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
    U.S. District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
    Fed Suppl; 1990 Aug; 744():1323-98. PubMed ID: 11648591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The role of women in abortion jurisprudence: from Roe to Casey and beyond.
    Martin PA
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1993; 2(3):309-19. PubMed ID: 8293219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. High Court, 5-4, affirms right to abortion but allows most of Pennsylvania's limits.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1992 Jun; ():A1, A15-17. PubMed ID: 11647923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the role of stare decisis.
    Laird V
    Mod Law Rev; 1994 May; 57(3):461-7. PubMed ID: 11656439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The evolution of the right to privacy after Roe v. Wade.
    Barnard D
    Am J Law Med; 1987; 13(2 3):365-525. PubMed ID: 11659051
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Compassion in Dying v. State of Washington.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, en banc
    Fed Report; 1996 Mar; 79():790-859. PubMed ID: 11648417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. People v. Frey.
    Illinois. Supreme Court
    North East Rep Second Ser; 1973 Mar; 294():257-9. PubMed ID: 12041231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Karlin v. Foust.
    U.S. District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
    Fed Suppl; 1997 Oct; 975():1177-235. PubMed ID: 11648430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A thorn in the side of privacy: the need for reassessment of the constitutional right to abortion.
    Kunz KA
    Marquette Law Rev; 1987; 70(3):534-71. PubMed ID: 11655884
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Justice Holmes and Roe v. Wade.
    Novick SM
    Trial; 1989 Dec; 25(12):58-64. PubMed ID: 11656018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Thornburgh v. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Wests Supreme Court Report; 1986 Jun; 106():2169-216. PubMed ID: 12041287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Women's Medical Center of Providence v. Roberts.
    U.S. District Court, D. Rhode Island
    Fed Suppl; 1982 Jan; 530():1136-54. PubMed ID: 11648520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The woman's right to know: a model approach to the informed consent of abortion.
    Renfer SO; Shaheen R; Hegarty M
    Loyola Univ Chic Law J; 1991; 22(2):409-43. PubMed ID: 11651345
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.