These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12041182)
61. The nature of the right to an abortion: a commentary on Professor Brownstein's analysis of Casey. West RL Hastings Law J; 1994 Apr; 45(4):961-7. PubMed ID: 11656423 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
62. The right of privacy and restraints on abortion under the "undue burden" test: a jurisprudential comparison of Planned Parenthood v. Casey with European practice and Italian law. Ross CS Indiana Int Comp Law Rev; 1993; 3():199-231. PubMed ID: 12091926 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
63. The dilemma of the Webster decision: deconstitutionalizing the trimester system. Kindregan CP Report Hum Reprod Law; 1990; 25-26():276-92. PubMed ID: 11686167 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
64. The legacy of Justice William Brennan. Glendon MA; Treene EW Hum Life Rev; 1998; 24(1):65-76. PubMed ID: 11660508 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
66. The Supreme Court on abortion funding: the second time around. Horan DJ; Marzen TJ St Louis Univ Law J; 1981; 25(2):411-27. PubMed ID: 11655812 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
67. Women's Medical Professional Corporation v. Voinovich. U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit Fed Report; 1997 Nov; 130():187-219. PubMed ID: 11648426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennnsylvania v. Casey. U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit Fed Report; 1992 Oct; 978():74-8. PubMed ID: 11648602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Tucson Woman's Clinic v. Eden. United States. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Wests Fed Rep; 2004; 379():531-57. PubMed ID: 16477726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Carhart v. Stenberg. U.S. District Court, D. Nebraska Fed Suppl; 1997 Aug; 972():507-31. PubMed ID: 11648431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. From arguments to Supreme Court opinions in Planned Parenthood v. Casey. Kassop N PS (Wash DC); 1993 Mar; 26(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 12085874 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
72. The Supreme Court, abortion, and the jurisprudence of class. Mariner WK Am J Public Health; 1992 Nov; 82(11):1556-62. PubMed ID: 1443311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Emancipation as freedom in Roe v. Wade. Bezanson RP Dickinson Law Rev; 1993; 97(3):485-512. PubMed ID: 11656343 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
74. American College of Obstetricians v. Thornburgh. U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit Fed Report; 1984 May; 737():283-319. PubMed ID: 11648491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Baird v. Department of Public Health. U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit Fed Report; 1979 Jun; 599():1098-103. PubMed ID: 11648332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Lifchez v. Hartigan. U.S. District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D Fed Suppl; 1990 Apr; 735():1361-77. PubMed ID: 11648588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Eubanks v. Stengel. U.S. District Court, W.D. Kentucky Fed Suppl; 1998 Nov; 28():1024-43. PubMed ID: 11648437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. The invalidity of Canada's abortion law--section 251 of the Criminal Code. Picher PC Crim Rep Can New Ser; 1974; 24():1-31. PubMed ID: 11663529 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
79. Abortion politics: writing for an audience of one. Estrich SR; Sullivan KM Univ PA Law Rev; 1989 Nov; 138(1):119-55. PubMed ID: 11656496 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
80. Abortion on demand in a post-Wade context: must the state pay the bills? Fordham Law Rev; 1973; 41(4):921-44. PubMed ID: 11661025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]