226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12041191)
41. Compulsory medical treatment of adults.
Riga PJ
Cathol Lawyer; 1976; 22(2):105-37. PubMed ID: 11664685
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. University of Cincinnati Hospital v. Edmond.
Ohio. Court of Common Pleas, Hamilton County
North East Rep Second Ser; 1986 Apr; 506():299-302. PubMed ID: 12041244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. The right of elderly patients to refuse life-sustaining treatment.
Annas GJ; Glantz LH
Milbank Q; 1986; 64(Suppl. 2):95-162. PubMed ID: 11649886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Treatment of incompetent child: parental wishes and Charter of Rights and Freedoms -- B. v. Children's Aid Society of Metropolitan Toronto.
Kennedy I
Med Law Rev; 1996; 4(1):117-22. PubMed ID: 11656916
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. In re E.G., a Minor: death over life: a judicial trend continues as the Illinois Supreme Court grants minors the right to refuse life-saving medical treatment.
Brewster WD
John Marshall Law Rev; 1990; 23(4):771-86. PubMed ID: 16622959
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Re T (Adult: Refusal of Medical Treatment).
Great Britain. England. Court of Appeal, Civil Division
All Engl Law Rep; 1992 Jul; [1992]4():649-70. PubMed ID: 11648226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Mercy Hospital v. Jackson.
Maryland. Court of Special Appeals
Atl Report; 1985 Apr; 489():1130-4. PubMed ID: 11648161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Blood transfusions, Jehovah's Witnesses and the rule of inviolability of the human body.
Kouri RP
Rev Droit; 1974; 5():156-76. PubMed ID: 11662988
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Health science research ethics and the law: research involving children.
Nassiry L
NCBHR Commun; 1993; 4(2):11-3. PubMed ID: 11652885
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Refusal of medical treatment on religious grounds: Re T (1992) 142 NLJ 1125 (CA) considered.
Bridge C
N Z Law J; 1992 Oct; ():341-4. PubMed ID: 11652735
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Parental rights and children's best interests: United States.
McBride G
BMJ; 1990 Jun; 300(6741):1673-4. PubMed ID: 11642789
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Freedom of religion versus civil authority in matters of health.
Flowers RB
Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci; 1979 Nov; 446():149-61. PubMed ID: 11651749
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Ethical considerations in blood transfusions: informed consent and religious refusal.
Botkin JR
Spine (Phila Pa 1986); 1991 Jan; 5(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 11654023
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Court says doctors were right to treat Jehovah's Witness.
Dyer C
BMJ; 1992 Aug; 305(6848):272. PubMed ID: 11643026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Jehovah's Witnesses and autonomy: honouring the refusal of blood transfusions.
Bock GL
J Med Ethics; 2012 Nov; 38(11):652-6. PubMed ID: 22790086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Parental rights and children's best interests: Cyprus and Britain.
Dyer C
BMJ; 1990 Jun; 300(6741):1673. PubMed ID: 11642788
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. In re Estate of Darrell Dorone.
Di Somma AV
Issues Law Med; 1989; 4(4):511-3. PubMed ID: 11644375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Blood transfusions and elective surgery: a custodial function of an Ohio juvenile court.
Zaremski MJ
Clevel State Law Rev; 1974; 23(2):231-44. PubMed ID: 11664328
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Refusal of treatment (child): competence -- Re L (Medical Treatment: Gillick Competency).
Grubb A
Med Law Rev; 1999; 7(1):58-61. PubMed ID: 11658027
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Compulsory medical treatment and religious freedom: whose law shall prevail?
Paris JJ
Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1975; 10(1):1-35. PubMed ID: 11661287
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
