236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12041210)
1. In re Mental Commitment of M.P.
Indiana. Court of Appeals, Second District
North East Rep Second Ser; 1986 Nov; 500():216-28. PubMed ID: 12041210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hightower v. Olmstead.
U.S. District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division
Fed Suppl; 1996 Sep; 959():1549-73. PubMed ID: 11648628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Woodland v. Angus.
U.S. District Court, D. Utah, C.D
Fed Suppl; 1993 Mar; 820():1497-519. PubMed ID: 11648607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In re C.E.
Illinois. Supreme Court
Wests North East Rep; 1994 May; 641():345-60. PubMed ID: 12041179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Rivers v. Katz.
New York. Court of Appeals
North East Rep Second Ser; 1986 Jun; 495():337-45. PubMed ID: 12041209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. New York court says mentally ill have right to refuse medication.
Gross J
N Y Times Web; 1986 Jun; ():A1, B10. PubMed ID: 11646485
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The right of the mentally ill to refuse treatment revisited.
Slovenko R
J Psychiatry Law; 1992; 20(3):407-34. PubMed ID: 11659854
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Rennie v. Klein.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Fed Report; 1983 Oct; 720():266-77. PubMed ID: 11648483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Of the parens patriae commitment power and drug treatment of schizophrenia: do the benefits to the patient justify involuntary treatment?
DuBose EZ
Minn Law Rev; 1976 Jun; 60(6):1149-218. PubMed ID: 11664731
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Judicial schizophrenia: an involuntarily confined mental patient's right to refuse antipsychotic drugs.
Cort RS
UMKC Law Rev; 1982; 51(1):74-106. PubMed ID: 11658656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Involuntary commitment and the right to refuse treatment with anti-psychotic drugs.
Hahn WA
Creighton Law Rev; 1982-1983; 16(3):719-42. PubMed ID: 11658455
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The importance of establishing competence in cases involving the involuntary administration of psychotropic medications.
Knepper K
Law Psychol Rev; 1996; 20():97-137. PubMed ID: 11656625
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. In re Orr.
Illinois. Appellate Court, Fourth District
North East Rep Second Ser; 1988 Nov; 531():64-75. PubMed ID: 12041254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rogers v. Okin.
U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Fed Report; 1984 Jun; 738():1-9. PubMed ID: 11648487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stensvad v. Reivitz.
U.S. District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Fed Suppl; 1985 Jan; 601():128-32. PubMed ID: 11648509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fleming v. Reid.
Canada. Ontario. Court of Appeal
Dom Law Rep; 1991 Jun; 82():298-320. PubMed ID: 12041088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In re Jarvis.
Minnesota. Court of Appeals
Wests North West Rep; 1988 Dec; 433():120-4. PubMed ID: 12041143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The right to refuse antipsychotic medications: law and policy.
Brooks AD
Rutgers Law Rev; 1987; 39(2-3):339-76. PubMed ID: 11659012
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Involuntary treatment: civilly committed patients may be involuntarily medicated; involuntary medication to restore competence to stand trial requires judicial approval.
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1999; 27(3):493-4. PubMed ID: 11645181
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Jarvis v. Levine.
Minnesota. Supreme Court
Wests North West Rep; 1988 Jan; 418():139-50. PubMed ID: 12041142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
