239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12041216)
1. Brophy v. New England Sinai Hospital, Inc.
Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court, Norfolk
North East Rep Second Ser; 1986 Sep; 497():626-46. PubMed ID: 12041216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Brophy v. New England Sinai Hospital.
Nimz MM
Issues Law Med; 1986 Nov; 2(3):221-34. PubMed ID: 11644064
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The Nancy Cruzan case.
McCormick RA
Midwest Med Ethics; 1989; 5(1-2):2-31. PubMed ID: 12091960
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. USCC brief in Nancy Cruzan case: continued nutrition and hydration urged.
United States Catholic Conference
Origins; 1989 Oct; 19(21):345-51. PubMed ID: 11652554
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Medical decisionmaking for incompetent persons: the Massachusetts substituted judgment model.
Dunphy SM; Cross JH
West New Engl Law Rev; 1987; 9(1):153-67. PubMed ID: 11649910
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A legal test of the right to die.
Malcolm AH
N Y Times Web; 1985 May; ():9. PubMed ID: 11646513
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Right-to-die case gets first hearing in Supreme Court.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 1989 Dec; ():A1, B26. PubMed ID: 11646739
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The search for objectivity in applying the substituted judgment rule in medical care cases.
King JC
Boston Bar J; 1993; 37(17):10-12, 14. PubMed ID: 11652649
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The right to death.
Dworkin R
New York Rev Books; 1991 Jan; ():14-7. PubMed ID: 11653244
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. When should the state step aside? Terminating treatment for PVS victims.
Harvey JC; Quinn KP; Johnson SH
Commonweal; 1990 May; 117(9):286-94. PubMed ID: 11652558
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Paul E. Brophy is dead at 49; tested rule on right to die.
N Y Times Web; 1986 Oct; ():B9. PubMed ID: 11646531
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. DeGrella v. Elston: Kentucky Supreme Court rules on an incompetent's right to die.
Mehrle JP
North KY Law Rev; 1994; 21(2):449-74. PubMed ID: 11653010
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Cruzan and the right to die: a perspective on privacy interests.
Watson DE
Mercer Law Rev; 1991; 42(3):1147-81. PubMed ID: 11651439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Brophy v. New England Sinai Hospital.
Paulus SM
Issues Law Med; 1986 Jan; 1(4):331-42. PubMed ID: 11651817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. From Quinlan to Cruzan: patterns in the fabric of US "right-to-die" case law.
Allsopp ME
Humane Med; 1992 Apr; 8(2):122-31. PubMed ID: 11651322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Cruzan and the constitutional status of nontreatment decisions for incompetent patients.
Robertson JA
Georgia Law Rev; 1991; 25(5):1139-202. PubMed ID: 11652580
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. In re Jobes.
New Jersey. Supreme Court
Atl Report; 1987 Jun; 529():434-65. PubMed ID: 11648265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A "terrible beauty", the Irish Supreme Court, and dying.
Feenan D
Eur J Health Law; 1996 Mar; 3(1):29-48. PubMed ID: 11654847
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Justices find a right to die, but the majority sees need for clear proof of intent.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 1990 Jun; ():A1, A18, A19. PubMed ID: 11646758
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Gray v. Romeo.
Di Somma AV
Issues Law Med; 1989; 4(4):535-40. PubMed ID: 11644379
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
