These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12041218)
21. In re Edna M.F. Wisconsin. Supreme Court North West Rep Second Ser; 1997 Jun; 563():485-501. PubMed ID: 12041175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Conservatorship of Morrison. California. Court of Appeal, First District, Division 5 Wests Calif Report; 1988 Nov; 253():530-5. PubMed ID: 11648269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. In re Drabick. Di Somma AV Issues Law Med; 1989; 4(4):519-24. PubMed ID: 11644377 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health. U.S. Supreme Court Wests Supreme Court Report; 1990 Jun; 110():2841-92. PubMed ID: 12041283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. In re Bayer. Kirkpatrick GA Issues Law Med; 1987; 3(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 11644092 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. In re Guardianship of Myers. Ohio. Court of Common Pleas, Summit County, Probate Division North East Rep Second Ser; 1993 Feb; 610():663-71. PubMed ID: 12041223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. In re Branning. Illinois. Appellate Court, Fourth District North East Rep Second Ser; 1996 Dec; 674():463-72. PubMed ID: 12041226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Cruzan II: a clear and convincing travesty. Bopp J; Avila D Natl Univ Law Rev; 1992 Apr; 1(1):1-47. PubMed ID: 11654704 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. A line less reasonable: Cruzan and the looming debate over active euthanasia. Grant ER; Cleaver CA Md J Contemp Leg Issues; 1991; 2(2):99-256. PubMed ID: 11651215 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Matter of Conroy. New Jersey. Supreme Court Atl Report; 1985 Jan; 486():1209-50. PubMed ID: 11648233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Opinion of the Attorney General No. 88-046. Maryland. Office of the Attorney General Opin Atty Gen State Md Md Atty Gen Off; 1988 Oct; 73():1-46. PubMed ID: 12041491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. In re Bayer. Di Somma AV Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(1):119-21. PubMed ID: 11644471 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Court to rule on right to die in case of brain injury victim. N Y Times Web; 1989 Jul; ():14. PubMed ID: 11646726 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Constitutional law--can a "life advocate" impair the constitutional right to reject life-prolonging medical treatment?--In re Jobes, 210 N.J.Super. 543, 510 A.2d 133. Armstrong A Cumberland Law Rev; 1986-1987; 17(2):553-68. PubMed ID: 11658968 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Caring or starving? The case of Claire Conroy. McCormick RA America (NY); 1985 Apr; 152(13):269-73. PubMed ID: 11658669 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. DeGrella v. Elston: Kentucky Supreme Court rules on an incompetent's right to die. Mehrle JP North KY Law Rev; 1994; 21(2):449-74. PubMed ID: 11653010 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. In re Zahn. Kirkpatrick GA Issues Law Med; 1987 May; 2(6):485. PubMed ID: 11644072 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Family matters: is big brother your next-of-kin? Lomasky LE Reason; 1990 Nov; 22(6):36-9. PubMed ID: 11652569 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. In re L.H.R. Georgia. Supreme Court South East Report Second Ser; 1984 Oct; 321():716-23. PubMed ID: 12041318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]