These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12041220)
1. In re Guardianship of Doe. Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court, Norfolk North East Rep Second Ser; 1992 Jan; 583():1263-77. PubMed ID: 12041220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The search for objectivity in applying the substituted judgment rule in medical care cases. King JC Boston Bar J; 1993; 37(17):10-12, 14. PubMed ID: 11652649 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. In re Guardianship of L.W. Wisconsin. Supreme Court Wests North West Rep; 1992 Apr; 482():60-79. PubMed ID: 12041147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Care and Protection of Beth. Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court, Hampden North East Rep Second Ser; 1992 Mar; 587():1377-83. PubMed ID: 12041221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cruzan and its impact on patient self-determination. Gilbert LJ J Fam Law; 1991-1992; 30(1):111-33. PubMed ID: 11659441 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. In re Drabick. California. Court of Appeal, Sixth District Wests Calif Report; 1988 Apr; 245():840-61. PubMed ID: 11648267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Refusal of life-sustaining treatment for terminally ill incompetent patients: court orders and an alternative. Rubin BL Columbia J Law Soc Probl; 1985; 19(1):19-68. PubMed ID: 11658755 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Constitutional law--right of privacy--qualified right to refuse medical treatment may be asserted for incompetent under doctrine of substituted judgment. Davis PK Emory Law J; 1978; 27(2):425-60. PubMed ID: 11665011 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Medical decisionmaking for incompetent persons: the Massachusetts substituted judgment model. Dunphy SM; Cross JH West New Engl Law Rev; 1987; 9(1):153-67. PubMed ID: 11649910 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. In re Lawrance. Indiana. Supreme Court North East Rep Second Ser; 1991 Sep; 579():32-48. PubMed ID: 12041219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. From Quinlan to Cruzan: patterns in the fabric of US "right-to-die" case law. Allsopp ME Humane Med; 1992 Apr; 8(2):122-31. PubMed ID: 11651322 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. In re Storar: the right to die and incompetent patients. Colabrese CA Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1982; 43(4):1087-107. PubMed ID: 11658613 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Gray v. Romeo. U.S. District Court, D. Rhode Island Fed Suppl; 1988 Oct; 697():580-91. PubMed ID: 11648270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A patient's last rights: termination of medical care--an analysis of New York's In re Storar. Day K Albany Law Rev; 1982; 46(4):1380-413. PubMed ID: 11658533 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The doctrine of substituted judgment in medical decision making. Lowy C Bioethics; 1988 Jan; 2(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 11649234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The limits of proxy decisionmaking for incompetents. Buchanan AE UCLA Law Rev; 1981; 29(2):386-408. PubMed ID: 11660397 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Someone make up my mind: the troubling right to die issues presented by incompetent patients with no prior expression of a treatment preference. Richard SM Notre Dame Law Rev; 1989; 64(3):394-421. PubMed ID: 11659243 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Brophy v. New England Sinai Hospital, Inc. Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court, Norfolk North East Rep Second Ser; 1986 Sep; 497():626-46. PubMed ID: 12041216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Coming to terms with death: the Cruzan case. Martyn SR; Bourguignon HJ Hastings Law J; 1991 Mar; 42(3):817-58. PubMed ID: 11652588 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]