These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12041221)
1. Care and Protection of Beth. Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court, Hampden North East Rep Second Ser; 1992 Mar; 587():1377-83. PubMed ID: 12041221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Custody of a Minor. Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court, Suffolk North East Rep Second Ser; 1982 Apr; 434():601-11. PubMed ID: 12041208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In re Guardianship of Doe. Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court, Norfolk North East Rep Second Ser; 1992 Jan; 583():1263-77. PubMed ID: 12041220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In re C.A. Illinois. Appellate Court, First District, Fourth Division North East Rep Second Ser; 1992 Oct; 603():1171-94. PubMed ID: 12041205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bioethics in the courts: summaries of selected judicial decisions, 1989 to 1995. Nelson LJ Clin Ethics Rep; 1995; 9(1-2):1-20. PubMed ID: 11653201 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Indiana's new health care consent act: a guiding light for the health care provider. Thompson WH Indiana Law Rev; 1988; 21(1):181-203. PubMed ID: 11659030 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. In re Conservatorship of Torres. Minnesota. Supreme Court Wests North West Rep; 1984 Nov; 357():332-41. PubMed ID: 12041145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In re L.H.R. Georgia. Supreme Court South East Report Second Ser; 1984 Oct; 321():716-23. PubMed ID: 12041318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Medico-legal implications of "orders not to resuscitate. Tecklenburg N Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1982; 31(3):515-37. PubMed ID: 11649468 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. In re Guardianship of L.W. Wisconsin. Supreme Court Wests North West Rep; 1992 Apr; 482():60-79. PubMed ID: 12041147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In re Estate of Longeway. Illinois. Supreme Court North East Rep Second Ser; 1989 Nov; 549():292-322. PubMed ID: 12041217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The doctrine of substituted judgment in medical decision making. Lowy C Bioethics; 1988 Jan; 2(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 11649234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Constitutional law--right of privacy--qualified right to refuse medical treatment may be asserted for incompetent under doctrine of substituted judgment. Davis PK Emory Law J; 1978; 27(2):425-60. PubMed ID: 11665011 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. In re Jane Doe. Georgia. Supreme Court South East Report Second Ser; 1992 Jul; 418():3-8. PubMed ID: 12041319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In re Drabick. California. Court of Appeal, Sixth District Wests Calif Report; 1988 Apr; 245():840-61. PubMed ID: 11648267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Virginia Natural Death Act--a critical analysis. Murphy JG Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1983; 17(4):863-79. PubMed ID: 11649800 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Live or let die; who decides an incompetent's fate? In re Storar and In re Eichner. Bates KW Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1982; 1982(2):387-400. PubMed ID: 11655681 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. In re Guardianship of Myers. Ohio. Court of Common Pleas, Summit County, Probate Division North East Rep Second Ser; 1993 Feb; 610():663-71. PubMed ID: 12041223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In re K.I. District of Columbia. Court of Appeals Atl Report; 1999 Jul; 735():448-67. PubMed ID: 11648639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In re Rosebush. Michigan. Court of Appeals Wests North West Rep; 1992 Sep; 491():633-42. PubMed ID: 12041146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]