183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12041236)
1. In re Moe.
Massachusetts. Appeals Court, Plymouth
North East Rep Second Ser; 1991 Oct; 579():682-7. PubMed ID: 12041236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Matter of Moe.
Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court, Worcester
North East Rep Second Ser; 1982 Mar; 432():712-24. PubMed ID: 12041253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Incompetency--Massachusetts applies substituted judgment to probate court sterilization proceedings--In re Moe, 385 Mass. 555, 432 N.E.2d 712 (1982).
Brewer PJ
Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1983; 17(1):211-20. PubMed ID: 11658782
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. In re Terwilliger.
Pennsylvania. Superior Court
Atl Report; 1982 Sep; 450():1376-86. PubMed ID: 11648535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In re Moe.
Massachusetts. Appeals Court, Worcester
North East Rep Second Ser; 1987 Dec; 517():170-2. PubMed ID: 12041232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ruling on consent: protection for patients and doctors.
Dyer C
BMJ; 1989 Feb; 298(6670):348-9. PubMed ID: 11644407
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Sterilization of the mentally retarded adult: the Eve case.
Starkman B
McGill Law J; 1981; 26(4):931-50. PubMed ID: 11650594
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. In re Moe.
Massachusetts. Appeals Court, Plymouth
North East Rep Second Ser; 1988 Jun; 523():794-5. PubMed ID: 12041234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In re Guardianship of Eberhardy: the sterilization of the mentally retarded.
Derouin J
Wis L Rev; 1982; 1982(6):1199-227. PubMed ID: 11651835
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. In re Guardianship of Matejski.
Iowa. Supreme Court
Wests North West Rep; 1988 Feb; 419():576-82. PubMed ID: 12041141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sterilization--where mentally retarded and presumably fertile daughter cannot understand or exercise her constitutional right to voluntary sterilization, equity court has jurisdiction to empower parents to exercise right on her behalf.
Fritschner SH
J Fam Law; 1980 Apr; 18(3):648-53. PubMed ID: 11658339
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. T v. T.
Great Britain. England. High Court of Justice, Family Division
All Engl Law Rep; 1987 Jul; [1988] 1():613-25. PubMed ID: 11648574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. F v. West Berkshire Health Authority.
Great Britain. House of Lords
All Engl Law Rep; 1989 May; [1989] 2():545-71. PubMed ID: 11648579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Re Eve.
Canada. Supreme Court
Dom Law Rep; 1986 Oct; 31():1-37. PubMed ID: 12041087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Capacity, competence, consent: voluntary sterilization of the mentally retarded.
Neuwirth GS; Heisler PA; Goldrich KS
Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1974 Fall-1975 Winter; 6(2):447-72. PubMed ID: 11663600
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. In re Moe.
Massachusetts. Appeals Court, Suffolk
North East Rep Second Ser; 1984 Oct; 469():1312-5. PubMed ID: 12041230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Consent to surgery on a mentally handicapped adult.
Bennion F
Solicit J; 1989 Feb; 133(8):245-7. PubMed ID: 11659307
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The sterilization rights of mental retardates.
Munro AB
Wash Lee Law Rev; 1982; 39(1):207-21. PubMed ID: 11658661
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Justice and care: mental disability and sterilization decisions.
Peppin P
Can Hum Rights Yearb; 1989-1990; 6():65-112. PubMed ID: 11659492
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Treatment without consent: intervention by the court.
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 May; 290(6479):1409-10. PubMed ID: 11658570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
