These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12041236)
21. Sterilization of mentally retarded persons: reproductive rights and family privacy. Scott ES Duke Law J; 1986 Nov; 1986(5):806-65. PubMed ID: 11658848 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Maxon v. Superior Court. California. Court of Appeal, Third District Rep Cases Determ Court Appeal State Calif; 1982 Sep; 135():626-34. PubMed ID: 12041101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Re K and Public Trustee. Canada. British Columbia. Court of Appeal Dom Law Rep; 1985 May; 19():255-85. PubMed ID: 12041079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Re Jane. Australia. Family Court Fed Law Rep; 1988 Dec; 94():1-31. PubMed ID: 12041105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Sterilisation, the mentally ill and consent to treatment. Fortin JE Mod Law Rev; 1988 Sep; 51(5):634-42. PubMed ID: 11659136 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. In re Guardianship of Doe. Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court, Norfolk North East Rep Second Ser; 1992 Jan; 583():1263-77. PubMed ID: 12041220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. In re T.P. Indiana. Supreme Court North East Rep Second Ser; 1985 Mar; 475():312-5. PubMed ID: 12041229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The Eve decision -- a common law perspective. Keyserlingk EW Rev Gen Droit; 1987; 18(3):657-75. PubMed ID: 11659379 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The judicial portrayal of the physician in abortion and sterilization decisions: the use and abuse of medical discretion. Asaro A Harv Womens Law J; 1983; 6(1):51-102. PubMed ID: 11658431 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Deciding for the intellectually impaired. Freeman M Med Law Rev; 1994; 2(1):77-91. PubMed ID: 11656865 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Addressing the consent issue involved in the sterilization of mentally incompetent females. Davis DD Albany Law Rev; 1979; 43(2):322-38. PubMed ID: 11665120 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. In re Truesdell. North Carolina. Court of Appeals South East Report Second Ser; 1983 Jul; 304():793-813. PubMed ID: 12041322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Substituted judgment in medical decision making for incompetent persons: In re Storar. Williams SE Wis L Rev; 1982; 1982(6):1173-98. PubMed ID: 11651834 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Medical decisionmaking for incompetent persons: the Massachusetts substituted judgment model. Dunphy SM; Cross JH West New Engl Law Rev; 1987; 9(1):153-67. PubMed ID: 11649910 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Italian court rules on mentally disabled girl's pregnancy. Simini B Lancet; 2000 Jan; 355(9197):49. PubMed ID: 11657828 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Medicine and human rights: emerging substantive standards and procedural protections for medical decision making within the American family. Baron CH Fam Law Q; 1983; 17(1):1-40. PubMed ID: 11658459 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Minors and mental incompetents: consent to experimentation, gifts of tissue and sterilization. Bowker WF McGill Law J; 1981; 26(4):951-77. PubMed ID: 11650595 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Exclusive juvenile jurisdiction to authorize sterilization of incompetent minors. Bays-Beinart DJ Indiana Law Rev; 1983; 16(4):835-60. PubMed ID: 11658574 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Medical care for the legally incompetent: Law Commission proposals. Great Britain. Law Commission Bull Med Ethics; 1993 May; No. 88():33-6. PubMed ID: 11652140 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Sterilization case has become fight over rights of retarded. Goldberg D Washington Post; 1994 Nov; ():A3. PubMed ID: 11647984 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]