These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12041237)

  • 1. Hope v. Perales.
    New York. Court of Appeals
    North East Rep Second Ser; 1994 May; 634():183-8. PubMed ID: 12041237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hope v. Perales: expanding medically necessary abortion rights of pregnant indigent women under New York and Nebraska state constitutional due process clauses.
    Brown M
    Neb Law Rev; 1993; 72(2):586-607. PubMed ID: 11656347
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hope Medical Group for Women v. Edwards.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
    Fed Report; 1998 Sep; 63():418-29. PubMed ID: 11648424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Doe v. Director of Department of Social Services.
    Michigan. Court of Appeals
    Wests North West Rep; 1991 Feb; 468():862-83. PubMed ID: 12041153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Doe v. Maher.
    Connecticut. Superior Court, Judicial District of New Haven
    Atl Report; 1986 Apr; 515():134-62. PubMed ID: 11648371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of public abortion funding decisions on indigent women: a proposal to reform state statutory and constitutional abortion funding provisions.
    Corns CA
    Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1991; 24(2):371-403. PubMed ID: 11656224
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fischer v. Department of Public Welfare.
    Pennsylvania. Supreme Court
    Atl Report; 1985 Dec; 502():114-26. PubMed ID: 11648358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The right to Medicaid payment for abortion.
    Butler PA
    Hastings Law J; 1977 Mar; 28(4):931-77. PubMed ID: 11663756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Women of the State of Minnesota v. Gomez.
    Minnesota. Supreme Court
    North West Rep Second Ser; 1995 Dec; 542():17-42. PubMed ID: 12041173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reproductive Health Services v. Freeman.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
    Fed Report; 1980 Jan; 614():585-601. PubMed ID: 11648325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Doe v. Department of Social Services.
    Michigan. Supreme Court
    Wests North West Rep; 1992 Jun; 487():166-94. PubMed ID: 12041154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fischer v. Department of Public Welfare.
    Pennsylvania. Commonwealth Court
    Atl Report; 1984 Mar; 482():1137-48. PubMed ID: 11648338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Amendment No. 336.
    Bartlett DF
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1975 Apr; 121(55):S5708-30. PubMed ID: 11663619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. State limitations upon the availability and accessibility of abortions after Wade and Bolton.
    Finn J
    Univ Kans Law Rev; 1976; 25(1):87-107. PubMed ID: 11663734
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fischer v. Department of Public Welfare.
    Pennsylvania. Commonwealth Court
    Atl Report; 1984 Sep; 482():1148-62. PubMed ID: 11648341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Orr v. Nelson.
    U.S. District Court, D. Nebraska
    Fed Suppl; 1994 Nov; 902():1019-22. PubMed ID: 11648423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Little Rock Family Planning Services v. Dalton; Orr v. Nelson.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
    Fed Report; 1995 Jul; 60():497-505. PubMed ID: 11648415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Women's Health Services v. Maher.
    U.S. District Court, D. Connecticut
    Fed Suppl; 1981 May; 514():265-76. PubMed ID: 11648347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Doe v. Percy.
    U.S. District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
    Fed Suppl; 1979 Sep; 476():324-34. PubMed ID: 11648353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Funding of medically-necessary abortions: a reexamination of U.S. law and a call for EC federalism.
    Nishi J
    Univ Chic Leg Forum; 1992; [1992]():517-38. PubMed ID: 11652961
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.