195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12041237)
1. Hope v. Perales.
New York. Court of Appeals
North East Rep Second Ser; 1994 May; 634():183-8. PubMed ID: 12041237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hope v. Perales: expanding medically necessary abortion rights of pregnant indigent women under New York and Nebraska state constitutional due process clauses.
Brown M
Neb Law Rev; 1993; 72(2):586-607. PubMed ID: 11656347
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Hope Medical Group for Women v. Edwards.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Fed Report; 1998 Sep; 63():418-29. PubMed ID: 11648424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Doe v. Director of Department of Social Services.
Michigan. Court of Appeals
Wests North West Rep; 1991 Feb; 468():862-83. PubMed ID: 12041153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Doe v. Maher.
Connecticut. Superior Court, Judicial District of New Haven
Atl Report; 1986 Apr; 515():134-62. PubMed ID: 11648371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of public abortion funding decisions on indigent women: a proposal to reform state statutory and constitutional abortion funding provisions.
Corns CA
Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1991; 24(2):371-403. PubMed ID: 11656224
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Fischer v. Department of Public Welfare.
Pennsylvania. Supreme Court
Atl Report; 1985 Dec; 502():114-26. PubMed ID: 11648358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The right to Medicaid payment for abortion.
Butler PA
Hastings Law J; 1977 Mar; 28(4):931-77. PubMed ID: 11663756
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Women of the State of Minnesota v. Gomez.
Minnesota. Supreme Court
North West Rep Second Ser; 1995 Dec; 542():17-42. PubMed ID: 12041173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reproductive Health Services v. Freeman.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Fed Report; 1980 Jan; 614():585-601. PubMed ID: 11648325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Doe v. Department of Social Services.
Michigan. Supreme Court
Wests North West Rep; 1992 Jun; 487():166-94. PubMed ID: 12041154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fischer v. Department of Public Welfare.
Pennsylvania. Commonwealth Court
Atl Report; 1984 Mar; 482():1137-48. PubMed ID: 11648338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Amendment No. 336.
Bartlett DF
Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1975 Apr; 121(55):S5708-30. PubMed ID: 11663619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. State limitations upon the availability and accessibility of abortions after Wade and Bolton.
Finn J
Univ Kans Law Rev; 1976; 25(1):87-107. PubMed ID: 11663734
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Fischer v. Department of Public Welfare.
Pennsylvania. Commonwealth Court
Atl Report; 1984 Sep; 482():1148-62. PubMed ID: 11648341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Orr v. Nelson.
U.S. District Court, D. Nebraska
Fed Suppl; 1994 Nov; 902():1019-22. PubMed ID: 11648423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Little Rock Family Planning Services v. Dalton; Orr v. Nelson.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Fed Report; 1995 Jul; 60():497-505. PubMed ID: 11648415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Women's Health Services v. Maher.
U.S. District Court, D. Connecticut
Fed Suppl; 1981 May; 514():265-76. PubMed ID: 11648347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Doe v. Percy.
U.S. District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Fed Suppl; 1979 Sep; 476():324-34. PubMed ID: 11648353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Funding of medically-necessary abortions: a reexamination of U.S. law and a call for EC federalism.
Nishi J
Univ Chic Leg Forum; 1992; [1992]():517-38. PubMed ID: 11652961
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
