195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12041237)
21. Little Rock Family Planning Services v. Dalton.
U.S. District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Little Rock Division
Fed Suppl; 1994 Jul; 860():609-31. PubMed ID: 11648416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The Supreme Court on abortion funding: the second time around.
Horan DJ; Marzen TJ
St Louis Univ Law J; 1981; 25(2):411-27. PubMed ID: 11655812
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Public funding of medically necessary abortions is not required under the Medicaid Act: Harris v. McRae, 100 S.Ct. 2671 (1980).
Gray AD
Tex Tech Law Rev; 1981; 12(2):483-99. PubMed ID: 11655635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The right to abortion under Medicaid.
Butler PA
Clgh Rev; 1974 Apr; 7(12):713-20. PubMed ID: 11663473
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Right to Choose v. Byrne.
New Jersey. Supreme Court
Atl Report; 1982 Aug; 450():925-51. PubMed ID: 11648363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. New York v. Sullivan.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Fed Report; 1989 Nov; 889():401-18. PubMed ID: 11648392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Hern v. Beye.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Fed Report; 1995 Jun; 57():906-13. PubMed ID: 11648418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Committee to Defend Reproductive Rights v. Myers: Medi-Cal funding of abortion.
Hendrickson E
Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 1978; 9(2):361-419. PubMed ID: 11664072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Maher v. Roe. 20 Jun 1977.
U.S. Supreme Court
U S Rep U S Supreme Court; 1977; 432():464-90. PubMed ID: 12038366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Fischer v. Commonwealth, Dept. of Public Welfare.
Pennsylvania. Commonwealth Court
Atl Report; 1982 Apr; 444():774-83. PubMed ID: 11648335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Doe v. Busbee.
U.S. District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division
Fed Suppl; 1979 Dec; 481():46-50. PubMed ID: 11648343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Constitutional law--denial of state Medicaid funds for abortions not 'medically necessary' does not violate the equal protection clause.
Barber CK
Howard Law J; 1978; 21(3):937-54. PubMed ID: 11663935
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Survey of abortion law.
Platt JG; O'Malley K
Ariz State Law J; 1980; 1980(1):67-216. PubMed ID: 11655392
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Doe v. Beal: abortion, Medicaid, and equal protection.
Wilcox JK
Va Law Rev; 1976 May; 62(4):811-37. PubMed ID: 11663695
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Doe v. Rose. 27 Jun 1974.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Fed Report; 1974; 499():1112-7. PubMed ID: 11645988
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Abortion on demand in a post-Wade context: must the state pay the bills?
Fordham Law Rev; 1973; 41(4):921-44. PubMed ID: 11661025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The racially disparate impact of restrictions on the public funding of abortion: an analysis of current equal protection doctrine.
Baron DR
Boston Coll Third World Law J; 1993; 13(1):1-61. PubMed ID: 11656354
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Doe v. Mathews.
U.S. District Court, District of Columbia
Fed Suppl; 1976 Oct; 422():141-7. PubMed ID: 11648360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. State constitutions as a source of individual liberties: expanding protection for abortion funding under Medicaid.
Vuernick R
J Contemp Law; 1993; 19(1):185-216. PubMed ID: 11652310
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The abortion-funding issue: a study in mixed constitutional cues.
Yarbrough TE
North Carol Law Rev; 1981 Mar; 59(3):611-27. PubMed ID: 11655747
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
