331 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12041242)
1. R.R. v. M.H.
Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court, Worcester
North East Rep Second Ser; 1998 Jan; 689():790-7. PubMed ID: 12041242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In re Adoption of Matthew B.-M.
California. Court of Appeal, First District, Division 3
Wests Calif Report; 1991 Jul; 284():18-38. PubMed ID: 11648597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In re Baby M.
New Jersey. Superior Court, Chancery Division, Family Part, Bergen County
Atl Report; 1987 Mar; 525():1128-76. PubMed ID: 11648146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Matter of Baby M., 3 February 1988.
United States. New Jersey. Supreme Court
Annu Rev Popul Law; 1988; 15():61. PubMed ID: 12289633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In re Baby M.
New Jersey. Supreme Court
Atl Report; 1988 Feb; 537():1227-73. PubMed ID: 11648559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Re an Adoption Application (Surrogacy).
Great Britain. England. High Court of Justice, Family Division
All Engl Law Rep; 1987 Mar; [1987]2():826-32. PubMed ID: 11648176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Doe v. Doe.
Connecticut. Supreme Court
Atl Report; 1998 Apr; 710():1297-337. PubMed ID: 11648441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Doe v. Attorney General.
Michigan. Court of Appeals
Mich Appeals Rep Mich Court Appeals; 1981 May; 106():169-74. PubMed ID: 12041107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Jaycee B. v. Superior Court.
California. Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division 3
Rep Cases Determ Court Appeal State Calif; 1996 Feb; 42():718-32. PubMed ID: 12041102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Doe v. Attorney General.
Michigan. Court of Appeals
Wests North West Rep; 1992 Jun; 487():484-90. PubMed ID: 12041159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Within the best interests of the child: the factor of parental status in custody disputes arising from surrogacy contracts.
Russell IS
J Fam Law; 1988-1989; 27(3):585-671. PubMed ID: 11650247
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Opinion of 19 April 1989.
United States. Oregon. Attorney General
Annu Rev Popul Law; 1989; 16():54. PubMed ID: 12344461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Re P. (Minors) (Wardship: Surrogacy), 12 March 1987.
United Kingdom. High Court
Annu Rev Popul Law; 1987; 14():58. PubMed ID: 12346767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Surrogacy, adoption, and custody.
Brahams D
Lancet; 1987 Apr; 1(8536):817. PubMed ID: 2882230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. McDonald v. McDonald.
New York. Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department
N Y Suppl Second Ser; 1994 Feb; 608():477-81. PubMed ID: 12041118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In re Baby M.
New Jersey. Superior Court, Chancery Division: Family Part, Bergen County
Atl Report; 1988 Apr; 542():52-5. PubMed ID: 11648177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In Re Baby M, 31 March 1987.
United States. New Jersey. Superior Court, Chancery Division, Family Part, Bergen County
Annu Rev Popul Law; 1987; 14():60. PubMed ID: 12346771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Anna J. v. Mark C.
California. Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division 3
Wests Calif Report; 1991 Oct; 286():369-82. PubMed ID: 11648598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Surrogate mothers.
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Jan; 290(6464):308. PubMed ID: 3917796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stiver v. Parker.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Fed Report; 1992 Sep; 975():261-75. PubMed ID: 11648601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
